To: Happy Valley Dude
As much as I hate to admit it, CNN's coverage is an order of magnitude better than Fox's.
To: ChicagoGuy
I find that MSNBC has been pretty good too (I can't believe I said that), but mostly I surf back and forth.
10 posted on
03/20/2003 7:50:06 AM PST by
arichtaxpayer
(Let's get on with the show!)
To: ChicagoGuy
agreed... here's another chance for them to change my mind, but I don't have high hopes.
To: ChicagoGuy
I liked their approach earlier, with showing the different correspondents, their locations, and their reports. However, they have started with their propaganda, so it's back to Fox.
19 posted on
03/20/2003 7:54:38 AM PST by
oil
To: ChicagoGuy
As much as I hate to admit it, CNN's coverage is an order of magnitude better than Fox's. I thought this would be the case,remembering how they owned the airwaves during Gulf War I, but flipping through the stations last night, I found Fox to be better than the others. Lots of reporters in the field, new information came fast, no feigned drama and Shep was at the top of his game. The only criticism I have is their translator during the Sadaam speech was not as good as CNN's.
I was very pleased with their reporting and they're going to be the one I turn to first.
42 posted on
03/20/2003 8:24:55 AM PST by
PaulJ
To: ChicagoGuy
As much as I hate to admit it, CNN's coverage is an order of magnitude better than Fox's.I can only take so many baby milk factory stories before I have to turn off CNN. However, if one believes CNN's spin, it'll only be a matter of days before every hospital, day care center and nursing home in Iraq has been pulverized.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson