Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: x
Thanks for your post. Labels, labels, labels. Neocon? Paleocon? Southern agrarian anarchists? I read the Weekly Standard, The American Conservative, National Review, Antiwar.com, and bunch of other sites and columnists. I don't have any flavor of conservatism that I agree with totally.

But for Frum to lump the likes of Raimondo in with Novak is just a disgusting guilt by association tactic (I have never liked Frum- twerp of the first order.)

I find myself in agreement with Buchanan with his last column. Now that the shooting has started let's hope for victory. We can resume the nit picking after when Sadaam is gone.

But overall- when reading the "neocon" war supporters I get a bad feeling that they really don't know what they are talking about, have lied, and are lying about a host of things. I feel they see things- not from how they are- but how they wish them to be. And though I don't agree with much of "paleo" thought I find the "neocon" or pro war right responses to the questions raised by the old right to be troubling (and should raise alarm bells with anyone.)

450 posted on 03/24/2003 3:24:51 PM PST by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: Burkeman1
Well said.
456 posted on 03/25/2003 9:43:18 AM PST by TradicalRC (Fides quaerens intellectum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson