1 posted on
03/18/2003 12:16:42 PM PST by
sourcery
To: sourcery
bump for later reading
2 posted on
03/18/2003 12:21:27 PM PST by
Fyscat
To: sourcery
Unions are taking out another of America's oldest corporations (the entire industry for that matter).
3 posted on
03/18/2003 12:21:41 PM PST by
uncitizen
(hostile freepers need not reply)
To: sourcery
The author of this article has an antiquated perspective of the global automotive cartel.
GM, Ford, Daimler-Chrysler, Toyota and Volkswagen are the transnational giants of this cartel.
Most other automotive companies are merely puppets with incestuously entangled financial ties back to one of these Big Five.
The annual revenues of these transnational corporations exceeds the GDP of many developed nations. As such, their financial influence corruptly distorts and dictates national policies to the detriment of citizens those governments supposedly represent.
6 posted on
03/18/2003 12:30:40 PM PST by
Willie Green
(Go Pat Go!!!)
To: sourcery
I do hope they can hold off until after they build my 2004/5 GT Ragtop...
7 posted on
03/18/2003 12:34:22 PM PST by
Hatteras
(The Thundering Herd Of Turtles ROCK!)
To: sourcery
As though the government woudln't bail them out....sheesh.
11 posted on
03/18/2003 12:43:40 PM PST by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: sourcery
I did not read all the FACTS this man presents, but he said Nissan is a por second to Toyota. I wonder where he puts HOnda. Then he forgets that the Tauras seems to be in the top three or four cars sold and that Fords truck and SUV business piles the cash into the company, so what is wrong has something do do not with sales or market share.
I'd say that this kind of thinking could rank up next to my weather man.
13 posted on
03/18/2003 1:01:39 PM PST by
q_an_a
To: sourcery
Oddly enough, success in the automobile industry is determined by producing cars people want to buy -- and buyers are not always completely rational. Chrystler was bailed out, but had the good fortune to get a CEO who saw the marketing trend. I can't think of a Ford product I would buy. Heck, I have trouble thinking of a Ford product, other than its trucks.
15 posted on
03/18/2003 1:07:20 PM PST by
js1138
To: sourcery
Nonsense. Consider the source.
(The Bear's Lair is a weekly column which is intended to appear each Monday, an appropriately gloomy day of the week. Its rationale is that, in the long '90's boom, the proportion of "sell" recommendations put out by Wall Street houses declined from 9 percent of all research reports to 1 percent, and has only modestly rebounded since. Accordingly, investors have an excess of positive information and very little negative information. The column thus takes the ursine view of life and the market, in the hope that it may be usefully different from what investors see elsewhere.)
To: sourcery
My wife wants us to buy one of these:
But I'm Buying American this time around.
26 posted on
03/18/2003 3:03:49 PM PST by
P.O.E.
(God Bless and keep safe our troops.)
To: sourcery
Ford's problem is that the CEO is a leftist wacko. It was doing pretty good until he took over. Leftists ruin businesses. See Loral and Time-Warner.
43 posted on
03/18/2003 3:44:01 PM PST by
Dog Gone
To: sourcery
Too many heated adjectives in the article. I don't trust the expertise of people who feel they need hot rhetoric to make a point.
47 posted on
03/18/2003 3:58:01 PM PST by
gcruse
(When choosing between two evils, pick the one you haven't tried yet.)
To: sourcery
Jaques Nassar is a major reason for Ford's ails.
Good riddance to him.
To: All; biblewonk
In the recession that began in 2000, and was delayed through 2002 in the automotive industry by aggressive "zero percent financing" deals and very low interest rates, the eventual sales downturn is likely to be severe, perhaps as severe as in 1978-82.On the upside, this should give the used-car market a chance to rebound. Since the mfrs. have been selling their new ones so aggressively, used car prices have been weak.
80 posted on
03/19/2003 7:54:24 AM PST by
newgeezer
(Drivers wanted. Automatics are for weenies.)
To: sourcery
... the rise of the ugly, dangerous and catastrophically fuel-guzzling sports utility vehicle, after all, was the result of a fuel efficiency standard mandated by government, from which SUVs, as "trucks" were exempt. Ooooooooooh! What a gratuitous slap in the testicles this statement conveys. I thought I bought my SUV's because they carried people (my kids, parents, boy scouts, soccer & basketball teams) safely and efficiently.
It is interesting how the enviro propaganda slides into so many otherwise informative screeds.
81 posted on
03/19/2003 8:03:51 AM PST by
Thommas
To: sourcery
I've owned two Fords and they were both TERRIBLE vehicles. I'll never own another one. I hate to say it, Freepers, but I take solice in NOT buying American Vehicles. My experiences have been less than fantastic and my foreign vehicles (Nissan Sentra, Hyundia Sonata, Volkswagen Jetta, Mazda Miata) have all been very reliable.
The only exception if my Fiance's Escort ZX2, but it happened to have been manufactured on the Mazda line outside of the United States.
Blame it on the Unions, or whatever you will, but I've been done with American cars for years. I added Daimler/Chrysler to the list when they gave money to Je$$e Jack$on. I added VW when Germany started to speak out. I guess I'm stuck with Japanese and Korean cars, now. =) If things get any worse, I'll be riding a bicycle.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson