Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timesink
The only thing that perks my ears up is te end "The disease seemed to weaken as it passed from person to person."

Diseases don't weaken with transmission.
6 posted on 03/17/2003 4:43:07 AM PST by Bogey78O (check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bogey78O
Diseases don't weaken with transmission.

Experts discounted the possibility that terrorism is the source and believe it almost certainly is a contagious infection that spreads most easily from victims to their doctors, nurses and families through coughing, sneezing and other contact with nasal fluids.

I love this. Seems to me like all it would take is half-a-dozen or so martyrs from the religion of peace willingly exposed to the contaminant, and then once contagious, sent on a world-wide shopping spree for 24 to 48 hours.

9 posted on 03/17/2003 6:08:34 AM PST by fivecatsandadog (fur, cryin' out loud...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Bogey78O
Diseases don't weaken with transmission.

Technically, no. But in effect, yes. Because if a virus is too lethal it kills its host before the host can pass on the virus. Thus as the virus continues to mutate, the less lethal variations are the ones that are spread more widely. It is speculated that the common cold viruses originally were quite lethal, but over time it is the less lethal variations that survived. From a virus survival perspective, it is better to cause only enough injury to spread and no more.

11 posted on 03/17/2003 7:10:47 AM PST by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson