Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
That was my original comment.

Marshalls point in 1803 differed from the one he made in Barron, 30 years later. The latter one was not consistent with the obvious original intent of the founders.
32 posted on 03/18/2003 9:37:11 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
But I showed you at #30 how it was consistent with the original intent.

At this point I'm going to have to ask you once again the question you've been reflecting back at me for the last few posts. Do you have any citations from the time period, or any other evidence beyond your own reading of the Bill of Rights, to suggest that the Founders intended for it to curtail state powers?

33 posted on 03/19/2003 7:49:06 AM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson