Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Victoria Delsoul; Alamo-Girl; Utah Girl; Remedy; Coleus; Polycarp; Caleb1411; Mr. Silverback
Dwindling ping
9 posted on 03/16/2003 11:02:23 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
Pro-life bump.
10 posted on 03/16/2003 11:11:36 AM PST by JusPasenThru (Bork, Thomas, Estrada...has the Left no shame?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
Thanks for the heads up!
12 posted on 03/16/2003 12:28:45 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
An amendment was submitted by Democratic sponsors that addressed a wide range of concerns only vaguely related to the proposed ban. Its backers trotted out a laundry list of things relating to women: funds for contraception, funds for insurance, funds for prenatal care and even emergency-room requirements for victims of rape. Republicans were taunted with: "If you care so much about children and about life, why not fund some of these programs?"

The government isn't a charitable organization, and it has no obligation to give things to people as socialists believe. Democrats are fond of funding because it empowers them, so why bother talking about something else like the horrific partial birth procedure?

16 posted on 03/16/2003 3:49:05 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson