[Just mythoughts]

Thought the same was until the day while in Atlanta "PERVERT" told us that we should follow what "BLIX" says, before "BLIX" ever blixed.

The "pervert" owes the MRS., big time and she wants that power back.

A third of this nation was repulsed by what the Clintons were trying to do to us, however, two-thirds believed we the one-third were picking on him, all about "SEX", it was his private business.

So long as they have access to our national security intelligence, I won't be taking my eyes off either of them.

[cardinal4]

So long as they have access to our national security intelligence, I won't be taking my eyes off either of them.

Something just struck me after reading your post. During the Sh*tbags occupation of the Whitehouse, Hillary lived "vicariously" through him, making and enforcing policy, smearing the detractors, etc. Now the situation is reversed, The Sh*tbags doing the work that Hillary did during the occupation. Those two are salt and pepper shakers, you cant have one without the other. Now more than ever, Im convinced she is running, effectively putting the sh*tbag back in office.

[laconic]

The one-third of us who were the stalwart opponents couldn't stand him on principle but I suspect that one-half of the other two-thirds supported him only because economic times were good and they wanted nothing to disturb the "good times". The remaining one-third either saw nothing wrong with what he did ("hey, so what if I did it look at what the president did") or are so reflexively liberal (like most of the NOW bunch of hypocrites) that they totally ignore what they would most strongly condemn in anyone they disagree with.