[Destro]

What escapes most of the rabble is that Blair is motivated, as a convinced Third Wayst Leftists, in perpetuating the one worldisim if the neo-liberals. This group, (who had American like Strobe Talbott proclaim that sovereignty would no longer matter in the near future and their would be one world govt.) only differ from neo-cons in that while the neo-cons want the same thing they want America's hegemony as the seat of this one world govt. The third-wayists want the UN as the govt. of this one world system.

That is why Blair is gung-ho for this. He has operated on the premise that the US would push along this one worldisim by acting as the world's police man for the UN. The Neo-cons gladly go along because they also want America as the worlds controller whose power comes from the White House (no congressional oversight need apply) and not the UN security council. But since both sides needed each other off to the UN they went at first...

Both neo-con and neo-liberal views are dangerous and a threat to the constitution of the USA as I know it.

[Hugin]

That term "neo-con" gets thrown around a lot, without any real definition. It is generally used as a perjorative for a) Jewish conservatives, or b) any conservative who is a nationalist and believes that in the modern world the best defense is a strong offense, and that we should stand up for friends and allies around the world. I'm in the latter group, so if that makes me a "neo-con", so be it.

[ApesForEvolution]

I find it quite hilarious that the strict rules of the united States' Senate are more 'religiously' adhered to than the Constitution of these same united States.