Law Professor urges UN to invade USA? Could U.N. use military force on U.S.?

www.worldnetdaily.com ^ | march 15,2003 | Art Moore

[longtermmemmory]

Are there any alumni who object to this? A few calls to their donation office should let our displeasure with the law school be known.

[elbucko]

Could the U.N. use military force?

Only in self defense.

[scouse]

Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, a human-rights group in New York City.

Is he any relation to that well known ultra leftist; Ellen Ratner; that ubiquitous talking head whose face carries enough Botox to wipe out the whole of sub-Saharan Africa?

[dwilli]

The invasion strategy wii be to double-park the members
limos all over NYC holding the city traffic hostage and negotiate the peace terms from that advantage.

[Grampa Dave]

Exactly in all of these cases the locals have to move first like as you note the alums. Then we make the issue a national issue of shame. The Deans have been reeling backwards since 9/11 on many of these situations.

[fjsva]

Let the U.N invade. Gives us a chance to test one of those MOAB's on the U.N. building.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

I sure wish The President would use the words' "clear and present danger" in regards to Iraq. That would put all of this type of horse puckey to rest. I thought he was close to saying it during the last press conference, but alas...not so.

[elbucko]

As you were:

"The Rat That Puked".

[David1]

Yes, he is Ellen's brother.

[aquitaine]

The link http://www.humanrightsnow.org/

[UncleSamUSA]

Isnt this like that old Peter Sellers movie where a 50th rate country declares war on the US assuming it will lose so it can get gobs of foreign aid?

Or is this like the story of Benedict Arnold who was a military hero but then tried to sell out the US in the Revolutionary War out of spite and desire for moneyh?

Or is this just plain vanilla, garden variety, left-wing academic, ivory-tower treason against the United States, punishable by imprisonment or death, pure and simple?

I personally vote for choice "C".

[David1]

LOL :-)

[litany_of_lies]

Go ahead, make my day.

[TommyDale]

I mentioned this a few days ago as a potential scenario. I was ridiculed, but today...here it is -- a call for the U.N. to take military action against the U.S. and its two remaining allies.

I will say this much: If it ever happens, the blue helmets will experience quite a showing of private arms in one of the biggest guerrilla warfares ever.

[RS]

This is absurd -
Almost as absurd as someone who calls themselves a law professor not stating the obvious - that the US has an absolute veto.

[maestro]

TOLERANCE?...........

.....The "Islamic U.N.".....HATES......"ROCK n ROLL"..........

.....(Its a religious despotic thing.)

/sarcasm

[Fitzcarraldo]

Only in self defense.

That's easy. Sadaam appeals to the U.N. as a member state under attack from parties in violation of the charter.

[Grampa Dave]

[chiller]

So...let me get this straight. The UN should go to war to stop the US from enforcing one their own UN "laws" (1441).

Sounds perfectly reasonable to me....BBBWWWAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHAAA !

[scouse]

Thanks for the link.