To: Dog Gone
That is a very significant piece of news, how unusual for the NY Times. This clearly has the forensics community in an uproar. A pandemic version of the flu has been discussed for years. Let me see now, at a 40% infection rate that would be roughly 2.5 billion infections and at a 2.5% mortality rate, that would be 6.25 million deaths. Time to invest in flowers, caskets, and mortuaries (tongue in cheek). Hospitals couldn't handle this load under any circumstances that I can imagine. The impact on the economy would be as devastating as the disease itself were it to come to pass.
To: Movemout
The experts are clearly worried. This doesn't seem to be a routine flu outbreak.
I'm sure our military planners are hoping it doesn't spread to Kuwait.
To: Movemout
Let me see now, at a 40% infection rate that would be roughly 2.5 billion infections and at a 2.5% mortality rate, that would be 6.25 million deaths.Off by a factor of ten. That would be 62.5 million deaths.
To: Movemout
"The impact on the economy would be as devastating as the disease itself were it to come to pass."
Look on the bright side...lower unemployment.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson