Why do you think he claims to have interviewed William Casey when Casey was in a coma? Why do you think he claims to know what Nixon was thinking during Watergate? Maybe half of what he writes is accurate and half is B.S. - but how do you know which half is which? That's the problem, and that's why I don't claim to know who Bush thinks is responsible for the anthrax attacks - because I will formulate an opinion when I see information from a reliable source, not from a discredit hack journalist who claims to be able to read minds.