Skip to comments.
PM declares 'solid evidence' of Iraq-link to al-Qaeda (Howard)
smh.com ^
| 3/14/03
Posted on 03/13/2003 7:16:18 PM PST by knak
Australia had solid evidence linking the al-Qaeda terrorist network to Iraq, Prime Minister John Howard said today.
"We have plenty of intelligence suggesting a number of things of the toleration of al-Qaeda people in Baghdad, of links between an al-Qaeda related organisation and Iraqi intelligence," Mr Howard told Melbourne Radio 3AW. "Now that's the solid evidence we have of links.
"I used the illustration of Pearl Harbour to make the point that if you wait until you have criminal jury proof that terrorists have got the weapons and are going to use them, it's too late."
Mr Howard yesterday in his nationally-televised address on Iraq said if Australia had to wait for proof beyond doubt of links, it would result in another Pearl Harbour.
In 1942, the Japanese attacked and caught a US fleet off guard causing mass casualties in Pearl Harbour, in Hawaii, and prompting the US to enter World War II.
Today, as he tried to sell his war pitch in a series of media interviews, Mr Howard again repeated the Pearl Harbour analogy, but said Australia possessed solid evidence of links between terrorists and the Iraqi regime.
Mr Howard said if Iraq and other rogue states weren't disarmed, Australia would be at greater risk of terrorist attacks.
"There is a general risk to the world, particularly to western societies if chemical and biological weapons spread because as they spread, so will increase the likelihood of them falling in terrorists' hands," he said.
"I am concerned the Australian community could suffer if weapons of mass destruction proliferate because if they proliferate they will fall into the hands of terrorists and like any other western nation, Australia is a terrorist target."
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaedaandiraq
1
posted on
03/13/2003 7:16:18 PM PST
by
knak
To: knak
I'm so glad you posted this; I saw it and tried to post it but goofed. Wish the PM had given more details but this is good for now.
2
posted on
03/13/2003 7:18:55 PM PST
by
Peach
To: knak
In 1942, the Japanese attacked and caught a US fleet off guard causing mass casualties in Pearl HarbourThe Japanese came back in 1942?
3
posted on
03/13/2003 7:20:09 PM PST
by
relee
To: Peach
I would love to see a freeper fight over the meaning of "nations of the West".
What makes one a WESTERN nation?
Is it democracy, christianity, equal rights, abortion rights, anti-slavery laws...
it would make an interesting debate.
Australia and Britain are on opposite sides of the globe... but are clearly WESTERN. Does it mean anything not Eastern? Does Japan fit the profile? Malaysia, Turkey? Israel?
fwiw...
To: relee
The Japanese came back in 1942?Well, the Aussies are on the leading edge of the International Date Line. Maybe it was 1942 in Australia. . . . . .
5
posted on
03/13/2003 7:28:11 PM PST
by
TexasNative2000
(When your enemy is making a fool of himself, just shut up and listen)
To: Robert_Paulson2
Oh, boy - you asked some good questions but too late at night for intelligence from this Freeper. And in the morning, I need my two cups of tea. By afternoon, ...
6
posted on
03/13/2003 7:29:03 PM PST
by
Peach
To: Peach
With a solid ally like the Australians who are standing shoulder to shoulder with us on Iraq. I can cut him some slack. I like the date line excuse though. The French get no slack from me. Let's Roll. Parley
To: relee
The Japanese came back in 1942?This guy has it all wrong, The germans bombed pearl harbor!!
To: knak
How about this little tidbit from when PM Blair was in Washington a couple of weeks ago:
THE PRIME MINISTER: Adam.
Q One question for you both. Do you believe that there is a link between Saddam Hussein, a direct link, and the men who attacked on September the 11th?
THE PRESIDENT: I can't make that claim.
THE PRIME MINISTER: That answers your question. The one thing I would say, however, is I've absolutely no doubt at all that unless we deal with both of these threats, they will come together in a deadly form. Because, you know, what do we know after September the 11th? We know that these terrorists networks would use any means they can to cause maximum death and destruction. And we know also that they will do whatever they can to acquire the most deadly weaponry they can. And that's why it's important to deal with these issues together.
Source:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030131-23.html
9
posted on
03/13/2003 7:43:54 PM PST
by
bigaln2
(Since when is hearsay evidence?)
To: Parley Baer
The French not only don't get cut any slack, they get kicked around a lot, and when they're down - let's keep kicking. Bunch of weenies with bad hair and long fingernails.
10
posted on
03/13/2003 7:52:54 PM PST
by
Peach
To: Robert_Paulson2
The term "western" is NOT a geographic term. Some of the things you mentioned (democracy, christianity etc.) are elements of a western state. The term used to imply the Cold War era distinction between East and West (communist vs. democratic). Since the collapse of communism, the meaning of the term has changed. Any country with a solid tradition of democratic institutions is a western country.
11
posted on
03/13/2003 7:53:15 PM PST
by
Mihalis
To: unix
The germans bombed pearl harbor!! "Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!"
8^) Gave me a good chuckle.
12
posted on
03/13/2003 7:54:31 PM PST
by
mattdono
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson