Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: votelife
bttt
75 posted on 05/22/2003 2:30:55 PM PDT by votelife (FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: votelife
As a means to bump this important thread:
Mrs. CLINTON. If the Senator will yield for one final point, I want the RECORD to be very clear that I value every single life and every single person, but if the Senator can explain to me how the U.S. Government, through the criminal law process, will be making these decisions without infringing upon fundamental rights, without imposing onerous burdens on women and their families, I would be more than happy to listen.

Referring to the underlined portion, Senator Clinton will on the one hand authorize the central government to take from families and individuals as much as the central authority sees fit in earned income (under her 'wise rule') and limit the behaviors and rights to any degree the central authority sees fit, but when it comes to banning a murderous method for slaughtering alive, sensing, individual human beings sequestered in a womb, she tips the boat over to allow any behavior another alive individual would choose to apply to that unborn individual, as long as the one choosing is a woman. In other words, even hiring a serial killer is not offensive as long as it is a woman doing the hiring and the job is to terminate a pregnancy the woman wants rid of (terminate a pregnancy = kill an alive individual human being vulnerable because of location).

Hillary Rodham Clinton doesn't believe there are certain unalienable rights applicable to the particular class of individual alive human beings based on their location, solely based on their location! Black people were treated similarly by her party prior to the Civil War. Hatellary Rodhamster is more than willing to totally disenfranchise the innocent, alive, unborn because it is the women who can vote, not the unborn. Were the unborn able to vote, Ms Toon would change her tune depending upon the potential vote counts of the two constituencies. In other words, to Hatellary and the DNC, the right to LIFE is negotiable for votes. Despicable!

76 posted on 05/22/2003 2:57:21 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson