"When she hit the car in front of her, she then put the car in reverse and hit the car behind her. She then put the car back into drive and accelerated at officers who had guns drawn."
No facts to support this. Even if this DID happen, again, from her point of view, she was accelerating at PEOPLE with guns drawn - people who she could not have known were officers.
I'm pretty sure they could provide photo's of the scene showing the damaged cars and the car she was driving when it came to a stop.
Sadly, we cannot examine things from her point of view. But we can examine the facts. I'll spot you an "if" here, for this statement.
If she hit two cars and then drove at the agents, her Uncle was doing a poor job of teaching her how to drive. He could have stopped her from taking those actions. After all, she was 14, how would she be able to think clearly enough to hit, shift to reverse, hit again, shift to drive, turn the wheel and accelerate. Alot for a 14 year old just pulling the car around to do with her Uncle sitting beside her, isn't it?
If you're going to introduce an element of complete and total conjecture to your argument, so will I.
The uncle, upon seeing the agents, yells to the girl, "These f*ckers are cops. Ram 'em! Now!". And let's assume she does as the uncle suggests.
What say you?