To: KEVLAR
So your assertion is that a 14, look at that number, year old was practicing driving with her Uncle at night with no lights on?
She can't get a driver's permit until 15, but she was practicing at 14.
Her uncle was in the car teaching her, but he didn't go over the check points to make sure she turned her lights on.
When she hit the car in front of her, she then put the car in reverse and hit the car behind her. She then put the car back into drive and accelerated at officers who had guns drawn. All while her uncle was "teaching her how to drive."
This is what you are asserting?
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
When she hit the car in front of her, she then put the car in reverse and hit the car behind her. She then put the car back into drive and accelerated at officers who had guns drawn. All while her uncle was "teaching her how to drive." He musta been teaching her drug dealer driving.
67 posted on
03/13/2003 11:47:53 AM PST by
Roscoe
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
"When she hit the car in front of her, she then put the car in reverse and hit the car behind her. She then put the car back into drive and accelerated at officers who had guns drawn. All while her uncle was "teaching her how to drive." Priceless, well thought out paragraph that makes perfect sense to me. For what it's worth, and I'm not kissing a*s here; you're one of the few participators in this thread who is GENUINELY making sense, introducing and subsequently validating excellent points.
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
This is decent too. I mistakenly forgot to include this piece:
So your assertion is that a 14, look at that number, year old was practicing driving with her Uncle at night with no lights on?
She can't get a driver's permit until 15, but she was practicing at 14.
Her uncle was in the car teaching her, but he didn't go over the check points to make sure she turned her lights on.
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
A couple questions for you that no one attempted to answer:
What exactly was she supposed to be a decoy for?
How did her father even know undercover DEA agents were outside if she was supposed to be a decoy for something?
Since the claim is that she was a decoy, Did he(the father) try to "flee" during the ordeal? Use a decoy, but sit there?
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Now you are just making up details of the story.
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
NO. I do not, as you have, take all of the statements made in the story as fact. Were you there? Do you believe that this 14 year old girl was trying to injure these officers? If so, would that be based on the statements of the involved authorities alone? Or maybe we can assume her intent based on her fathers profession? What will the family gain by lying? It won't bring thier daughter back. I don't think it will get the father off the hook for any charges he may be facing. On the other hand, doctoring the story may benefit the officers involved if they were overzealous in thier actions that resulted in the death of a 14 year old child. Yes, look at that number.
76 posted on
03/13/2003 12:00:43 PM PST by
KEVLAR
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson