Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jim35
What? Its not impossible, a single ccd and memory chip are certainly small enough. A single law suit thwarted would pay for the cost. It would seem to make all the sense in the world. Moreover, if the cameras can be turned on us everywhere else, then why not to protect us.
48 posted on 03/13/2003 10:34:30 AM PST by PaxMacian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: PaxMacian
Its not impossible, a single ccd and memory chip are certainly small enough.

Don't integrate it into the gun, integrate it into the uniform. It shouldn't be active only when a weapons clears the holster, it should be active while the officer is on duty. It'd be a win-win. Excessive force lawsuits against cops will likely drop when you've got video evidence (no more "incidents" for the 'race-baiting poverty pimps' to exploit for gain) and assure they're acquitted of false charges, and the rights of suspects are protected by the video evidence as well if the cops themselves violate the law, since it'll all be on record.

Technofixes aren't a total panacea, but I figure that if the government wants to keep us under surveillance, we should demand the same of them. The physical equipment required for basic A/V wouldn't be too hard (it'd have to be ruggedized, lightweight, low power, and the communications link robust enough to handle the data transmission). The legal framework for handling the data would have to be worked on (how it's stored, under what circumstances it'd be accessible, etc.) That way it makes it a bit easier to keep everyone honest.

57 posted on 03/13/2003 10:54:31 AM PST by adx (Will produce tag lines for beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson