Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ThePythonicCow
The evidence in the First Strike book is overwhelming. Sometimes the crowd decrying all this as tin foil hat speculation is right, sometimes they are wrong. You have to look at the facts of the case to have a good idea who's right.

Over 100 witnesses from all over Long Island claim to have seen a red streak go up towards the aircraft, several with prior experience in the military identified as a missile. When you plot their sightings they all triangulate to the same place as the source of the missile. Now how would over 100 people who have no connection with each other manage to fabricate something like that if it were not in fact true?

87 posted on 03/13/2003 11:43:53 AM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker; eno_
FYI
88 posted on 03/13/2003 11:52:19 AM PST by shamusotoole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: Wil H
Yes - in case it's not obvious, I agree. The missile(s) was/were real - the folks denouncing the missile claims as being tin foil hat conspiracy theories are wrong, at least in this case.
89 posted on 03/13/2003 12:04:22 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (Mooo !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson