Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cacophonous
Summary with citations here.
68 posted on 03/13/2003 5:38:40 AM PST by kristinn (HumanShieldAgainstTerrorists@WhiteHouse.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: kristinn
Thank you.

If I read it correctly, through my non-lawyer eyes, the case was tossed because the plaintiffs lacked legal standing to bring the suit (whatever that means), and the SC actually refused to hear it without comment.

I still think a stronger lawsuit would work. But, as I said, I'm not a lawyer.

73 posted on 03/13/2003 5:42:51 AM PST by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson