Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mach.08
I didn't say getting the radar data would be easy. But it would be conclusive. I agree the CIA/NTSB digitized film doesn't make a positive impression. (Keep in mind that until the 1990s, people were 100% wrong about the specifics of how the Titanic sunk, though.) Don't assume because some explanations seem murky they are necessarily wrong.

A "major reduction in speed" can occur when a LOT of things happen. Elmer Barr, for example, has a pretty plausible explanation that the front cabin door was defective and blew off; and he has a pretty good development of exactly how this would result in precisely the pattern TWA 800 showed.

My point remains: there is pretty conclusive evidence out there that would solve this, and the effort ought to be in getting that. My suspicion---and I'm not "calling names"---is that NOT having the radar evidence is convenient to the conspiracy crowd. But like I say, I'm certainly willing to believe it if the tapes show it.

BTW, I noted in the article that EVERYONE admits one of the "unidentified" signatures was a Navy P3, which is not part of the equation---except its radar was malfunctioning.

So all that remains is ONE unidentified signature that the FBI refused to comment on. Note that we are not talking about a signature that shows up repeatedly on a path heading to TWA 800 (as far as we are told in the article) but is a "one-time" sighting.

MY point is that missiles will give off fairly constant signatures, and as many radars as were operating that day, well, we'd have a boatload of evidence on a missile.

92 posted on 03/18/2003 11:54:36 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson