[LS]

The upshot of ALL of this is---and we've been over this dozens of times before---that the "red residue" can ONLY have come (and this is admitted by most of the "kooks") from a "pass through" drone missile, not an armed explosive warhead. Sanders himself, unless he changed his tune, postulated this theory.

So what? Well, there not only are no radar signatures of a "drone/pass-through" missile that day, but no signatures of the ASSURED "chase" missile that would have been following it.

Short version: to accept the nub of all this---that the "red residue" is obvious evidence of a missile strike---you have to produce evidence of not only ONE missle (the drone) but a SECOND missile. I await a jury's response to such common sense, and NO missile radar signature, anywhere, has EVER been produced, which may well be why the government said, "Hell, let it go on."

[acehai]

and NO missile radar signature, anywhere, has EVER been produce...

Just how in hades would you know what has been produced? Have you looked at all the radar data that was generated that night???