Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beijing plans to use North Korea to help drive the US out of the Pacific
BrookesNews.Com ^ | 13 March 2003 | Peter Zhang

Posted on 03/12/2003 2:58:14 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2003 2:58:14 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The Octoganarian commies of Beijing will fall.
2 posted on 03/12/2003 3:02:38 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Since they can't drive us out of the world, we're going to have to take action. If China wants to play this game, I'd advise we find a new nation to carry on trade with. Let China drift back into the 17th century.
3 posted on 03/12/2003 3:03:09 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Are you going Freeps Ahoy! Don't miss the boat. Er ship...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The Chinese will be begging for us to return if the Japanese start getting active. But, I doubt we will be going anywhere soon. The same may not hold true for the Chinese.
4 posted on 03/12/2003 3:03:20 PM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie; DoughtyOne; jwalsh07
FYI




5 posted on 03/12/2003 3:05:06 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
China better watch out for a strong southeast wind this spring or summer.

The fallout is a killer!

6 posted on 03/12/2003 3:06:08 PM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
This guy seems to have the situation analyzed correctly.
7 posted on 03/12/2003 3:07:54 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
As I recall, this guy was writing for an Aussie paper several years ago during the Clinton games, and was pretty good at describing US/China policies and games.

Do you think that our State Dept sees it like this article says? Or the CIA? Or the Defense Dept? Or Bush/Cheney/Rice? We'll see, I guess.

No American columnist has written these things, have they?
8 posted on 03/12/2003 3:08:00 PM PST by RandyRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
"The Octoganarian commies of Beijing will fall"

The mantle was recently passed to a relatively young despot.

9 posted on 03/12/2003 3:12:48 PM PST by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Who has China had direct armed conflict with in the last 40 years?

Russia or the US?

What country does China have massive territorial claims on?

Russia or the US?

Food for thought. If one is of a conspiratorial bent there's a lot of smoke obscuring China's REAL long-term target.


10 posted on 03/12/2003 3:12:59 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RandyRep
Read Tom Clancy's "The Bear and the Dragon".

It's pretty damn scary how right he is...
11 posted on 03/12/2003 3:15:31 PM PST by smokeyjon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I wonder how Taiwan fits into the picture? Maybe if China thinks the U.S. is going to abandon the western Pacific, they can have free reign with Taiwan.
12 posted on 03/12/2003 3:16:51 PM PST by Ruger1099
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big ern
"This guy seems to have the situation analyzed correctly"

If so, it is further indication that Bill Clinton's worst nightmare...that the world will come to recognize he was a total joke as president,will be his legacy...despite his frantic efforts the remainder of his days to keep the blinders on those who want to believe the playboy imposter president was anything but a disgrace and a traitor to the nation.

13 posted on 03/12/2003 3:19:05 PM PST by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I doubt the Chinese think they can oust us. They recognize the chasm between us militarily and economically.
14 posted on 03/12/2003 3:19:32 PM PST by 7 x 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Oh, you guys just hate Bill Clinton. Get over it. :)

PS -- no one hates this lying, perjuring, raping, traitorous, impeached, disbarred bastard more than do I.

15 posted on 03/12/2003 3:19:48 PM PST by doug from upland (Like Osama, you on the left can kiss my royal Irish *ss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
So what to do about Kim? Beijing will not allow him to attack the South. And it will not allow him to launch a suicidal attack against the US. It won't let him give
nuclear weapons to terrorists. (One of them might even end up in Beijing).

I don't have much negative to say about the article, as it provides some interesting commentary and assessment.  This is one statement I'm absolutely convinced is false.  China facilitated nuclear weapons in Pakistan.  For anyone whose missed it, Pakistan is a very problematic state.  It could go south at about any time.  When it does, the chances of nukes or even nuke technology winding up in the hands of terrorists is way better than 50/50.

We haven't seen attempts over the years to develop nukes in Iran, Iraq, North Korea and other nations.  All of a sudden, just at the time of China's emergence into onto the global stage, all these nations have nuclear programs of advancing technology. I believe that the North Korean tactic this writer mentions, is being utilized with a number of other states.

Europe, Russia and China all deserve some credit for this.  For the almight Euros, Franks, Duetch Marks, Yen, even dollars, folks have been willing to gift these terrorist states with goodies, read that nuclear related goodies.

I've taken China to task for it, but the other nations are going to have to take their fair share of credit for it as well.  And guess what, we'll find some Americans complicit in the problems we'll face in Iraq, Iran and other places.  We have a bunch of idiots in this world.  It's getting harder to stop them from selling their grandmother for some currency, and not all that much currency either.

We even had a President compromise some positions for a few hundred grand.

16 posted on 03/12/2003 3:29:21 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Are you going Freeps Ahoy! Don't miss the boat. Er ship...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Beijing's assessment of Clinton the man and his advisors persuaded her that Kim could successfully blackmail Washington, which he did with an ease that even surprised Beijing. The result of Clinton's cowardice was that Kim got nuclear weapons facilities and billions of dollars in aid, which relieved Beijing of the necessity of providing more aid to prop up the North.

Clinton to his Red masters handlers .. "Mission Accomplished"

17 posted on 03/12/2003 3:30:58 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I'm a big believer, and getting to be a bigger believer in a missile defense system.

We have to prioritize this technology, and may God help us if the libs get back in charge in the forseeable future.

As we know from the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, many far left libs do not think we should have a technological "advantage".

18 posted on 03/12/2003 3:31:27 PM PST by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Maybe so, maybe no. The things Beijing does not want out of this seem to me more likely than the things they do - the former include a rearmed Japan providing a regional counterweight to China that at the moment does not exist, and deployment of more, and not fewer, U.S. troops in an aroused and frightened South Korea. Further, China does not really want to lose her handy buffer state, but reunification on Southern terms will effect precisely that. OTOH, a South Korea committed to absorption of an utterly devastated and impoverished North is unlikely to present economic competition to China's nascent high-tech industries, but a unified Korea as a next-door neighbor is something China will have to deal with in a very different way from her current benign neglect of NK.

One thing is certain - the Chinese do not want a certified lunatic lobbing real nuclear weapons around the theater. Nor will the Japanese permit it - the prevailing wind is west-to-east.

In reality, though, I think the Chinese are waiting and watching how the U.S. reacts to this essentially unprovoked brinksmanship on the part of North Korea. What we will do in this sort of situation is knowledge far, far more valuable to their strategists than what we might do.

19 posted on 03/12/2003 3:33:30 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John H K
China's REAL long-term target

That's right. All the way to Poland.

20 posted on 03/12/2003 3:36:05 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson