Skip to comments.
Junk Science Alert!
The Chronicle of Higher Education ^
| 1/31/03
| ROBERT L. PARK
Posted on 03/12/2003 9:21:09 AM PST by gomaaa
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
The prevalence of junk science today is truly disturbing. Judges are not the only ones who can benefit from knowing these warning signs. Circulate this among friends and family!
1
posted on
03/12/2003 9:21:09 AM PST
by
gomaaa
To: gomaaa
Yep, I agree. After all, "everything that could ever be invented has already been invented..."
To: RoughDobermann
Out of curiousity, who said that?
3
posted on
03/12/2003 9:25:05 AM PST
by
gomaaa
To: gomaaa
Good rules of thumb.
4
posted on
03/12/2003 9:27:04 AM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: gomaaa
IIRC, some English twit. I'll see if I can find out...
To: gomaaa
I think I misquoted. I believe that it was actually, "Everything worth having must already have been invented."
To: gomaaa
Here ya go.
"Everything that can be invented has been invented." - Charles H. Duell
Questionably attributed to him anyway.
To: gomaaa
He was American Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents
To: RoughDobermann
Gracias.
9
posted on
03/12/2003 9:33:57 AM PST
by
gomaaa
To: gomaaa
I believe it came from the head of the US patent office in the late 1800's.... whoever he was...
10
posted on
03/12/2003 9:36:03 AM PST
by
tje
To: RoughDobermann
Of course, they are only warning signs -- even a claim with several of the signs could be legitimate. As rules of thumb, I think the author has a good point. However, just because someone thinks something is impossible, doesn't necessarily make it so.
11
posted on
03/12/2003 9:42:41 AM PST
by
Hodar
(American's first. .... help the others, after we have helped our own.)
To: RoughDobermann
That isn't what he said.
To: Hodar
Yeah, they don't always apply. Einstein was a lowly patent clerk who worked largely alone and suddenly turned physics on its head. Then again he did have a good physics education and published first in a good journal. The rules here will allow people to filter out the vast majority of cranks.
13
posted on
03/12/2003 9:47:50 AM PST
by
gomaaa
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Yes, like I said, questionably attributed to him.
To: gomaaa
The Patent and Trademark Office recently issued Patent 6,362,718 for a physically impossible motionless electromagnetic generator There could be a few dozen claims in the original application and the patent granted to only one of the claims. For example, the PTO might grant a design patent for the shape of a magnet without granting a patent for a ZPE machine in its entirety.
15
posted on
03/12/2003 9:48:04 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
To: Hodar
Indeed
To: gomaaa
Judges are not the only ones who can benefit from knowing these warning signs.1. The discoverer pitches the claim directly to the media
"I did not have sex with that woman"
2. The discoverer says that a powerful establishment is trying to suppress his or her work
"It's a Right Wing Conspiracy"
3. The scientific effect involved is always at the very limit of detection.
"Stained blue dress"
4. Evidence for a discovery is anecdotal.
"It was just about sex"
5. The discoverer says a belief is credible because it has endured for centuries
"Everybody cheats"
6. The discoverer has worked in isolation
"It's the hardest he's ever worked in his life, and it's for the children!"
7. The discoverer must propose new laws of nature to explain an observation.
Define what "is" is.
17
posted on
03/12/2003 9:48:47 AM PST
by
husky ed
(FOX NEWS ALERT "Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead" THIS HAS BEEN A FOX NEWS ALERT)
To: gomaaa
While I do tend to hate junk science myself, you have to consider the source. Dr. Park is not exactly impartial about things outside of scientific establishment. He also is hard-wired against human space travel, and wastes no opportunity to bash NASA for it's fixation upon it. It seems this article is meant to merely bolster his "NASA is just nutty" premise in a general way. Character assasination, if you will.
The field of electrogravitics (his first example in the article) is subject to the whims of peer review and scientific community peer pressure. In the 40's and 50's a fellow by the name of T.Townsend Brown had government backing for such research, and the results of his work still stand as valid. I've seen his stuff denegrated a goodly bit, though, and researchers who try to realistically follow up on his work often find themselves unpublished and alone. Such is the capricious nature of scientific circles.
Park's rules are useful, when it is assumed that they'll be applied scientifically. Often, however, they are abused.
18
posted on
03/12/2003 9:50:17 AM PST
by
Frank_Discussion
(Time is the fire in which we burn...)
To: RightWhale
True, and it's my understanding (though this could be wrong) that the gadget in question doesn't have to actually work in order to get a patent on it. That doesn't make it any less rediculous that someone thought this sort of thing COULD work, but the system gives them the benefit of the doubt.
19
posted on
03/12/2003 9:51:41 AM PST
by
gomaaa
To: gomaaa
the gadget in question doesn't have to actually work That's true. One thing the PTO refused to consider last time I checked is any kind of perpetual motion device. I assume a ZPE device would be considered a perpetual motion device if the claims present it as such. It's all in how the claims are written.
20
posted on
03/12/2003 9:56:08 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson