Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam And A 9/11 Link?
Gopusa.com ^ | March 10, 2003 | Carol Devine-Molin

Posted on 03/10/2003 7:33:29 PM PST by politicalpal

Saddam And A 9/11 Link? By Carol Devine-Molin March 10, 2003

This past week, the cable news channels have been obsessed with drawing a possible connection between Iraq and the events of September 11th. What is truly fascinating is that recently apprehended Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, now dubbed "the kingpin of Al Qaeda", masterminded the September 11th attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, while his nephew, Ramzi Yousef, with whom he worked closely on past occasions, orchestrated the 1993 World Trade Center bombing eight years earlier. Oh, did I forget to mention that Ramzi Yousef was thought to be an Iraqi agent? Now that both of these beauties are in custody, maybe we can better gauge Iraq's role in transnational terrorism. Apparently, the two are of the Baluch ethnic group (Baluchistan is a province of Pakistan, although historically the Baluch territory is divided among Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan), which established favorable relations with Saddam Hussein's regime, according to Laurie Mylroie, a noted expert on Iraq.

The first question that comes to mind is whether Yousef's uncle, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad of al-Qaeda, also colluded with Iraq at various junctures. Most probably, although Ramzi Yousef had the stronger ties to Iraq, and carried both Iraqi and Pakistani passports. But that still doesn't necessarily peg Iraq as a participant in the September 11th attacks -- and that is attributed to the nature of the terror network itself. In his book, "The War Against The Terror Masters", scholar Michael Ledeen notes: "The best way to think of the terror network is as a collection of mafia families... As in 'The Godfather', sometimes the Barzinis and the Corleones and the others join together to fight the feds". Making the fine point here, sometimes "evil doers" collaborate on a particular terrorist plot, and sometimes they don't. In any event, Ledeen underscores that members of the overall terror network widely assist each other when called upon -- a modus operandi that was only truly grasped by the intelligence community after September 11th. Clearly, terror perpetrators are significantly enmeshed, with interaction and interdependence in abundance.

Which entities comprise the terror network? The primary players are the terror states that sponsor terrorism (providing monies, safe haven, training grounds, intelligence, weaponry, etc.), and the terrorist organizations themselves. The players often conspire and collaborate with one another in a variety of configurations -- terror states cooperate with other terror states, terror states cooperate with terror groups, and terror groups cooperate with each other. Illustrative of this concept, Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini worked in tandem with Syria's Assad, actually bolstering Assad's regime in the process as they established Hezbollah in Lebanon. And Hezbollah lends a hand to those groups in the region that are also bent on destroying Israel.

Iran created "the model" for transnational terrorism years ago, as the Ayatollah Khomeini regime readily formed alliances with any nation or group that could buttress his Hezbollah organization. The "Big Three" terror states, Iran, Iraq and Syria, contribute in varying fashions to all of the major terror groups in the Middle East, with Saudi Arabia furnishing beaucoup bucks to al-Qaeda, the pro-terror Palestinian contingents, and promulgating the apocalyptic Wahhabi cult that's at the core of radical Islam.

To my knowledge, the available evidence strongly militates for an al-Qaeda run operation on September 11th, the brainchild of Osama bin Laden and his cohorts who had been ensconced in Afghanistan at the time. If Iraq had any input regarding the "Day of Infamy", it probably would have been peripheral at best. I suppose the thought of Saddam Hussein behind September 11th makes for scintillating TV, but frankly there are already solid reasons for toppling Saddam Hussein who poses an unacceptable threat to the US and other western democracies. Saddam is now feeling the heat, and realizes that "high noon" is closely at hand - and his likely demise once the war begins. So, no, Saddam does not feel kindly toward America and, if that lunatic had his druthers, there's no question that he'd blithely annihilate us all on our home soil.

In referencing September 11th at his recent news conference, President Bush established that Saddam Hussein is well capable of inflicting another "Day of Infamy" upon us, given his malevolent intent, his catastrophic weaponry, and his association with terrorist surrogates. President Bush asserted: "Saddam Hussein is a threat to our nation. September the 11th changed the strategic thinking, at least as far as I was concerned, for how to protect our country. My job is to protect the American people... September the 11th should say to the American people that we are now a battlefield, that weapons of mass destruction in the hands of a terrorist organization could be deployed here at home". History is replete with static defenses (in America's case, oceans on both sides of the continent, in other eras it was Hadrian's Wall and the Great Wall of China) that ultimately failed to deter tenacious enemies. When Weapons of Mass Destruction are thrown into the mix, it becomes vital that we rout the Jihadists before they assail us.

True, Saddam Hussein may have had little or nothing to do with the horrific attacks of September 11th. However, it's important to remember that this murderous thug was linked to both an attempted assassination on former President Bush (Bush 41) during a planned visit to Kuwait, and the first attack upon the World Trade Center in 1993. As to the latter, intelligence and law enforcement sources concluded that the mastermind of the first WTC attack was indeed Ramzi Yousef, with ties to both al-Qaeda and Iraq. In her book entitled, "Study Of Revenge: Saddam Hussein's Unfinished War Against America", author Laurie Mylroie stated: "The early suspicions of New York law enforcement that Iraq was behind the bombing never changed over the course of the investigation or the trial. After the March 4, 1994 verdicts against the first set of Trade Center defendants, Jim Fox (Director of the FBI's New York office at the time) told the 'Chicago Sun Times' that Yousef appeared to be guided by a foreign intelligence agency and that Iraq, seeking revenge for the Gulf War, might well have been behind the bombing. Later, Fox told me that the majority of senior law enforcement officers in New York believed that Iraq was involved".

Suffice it to say that Saddam Hussein is a monstrous individual, irrespective of any involvement in September 11th. Rather than contemplating some tenuous link between Iraq and the "Day of Infamy". Americans would be better served by news media that provided in-depth examination of the Islamist terror network, with particular attention to the roles of radical mosques and affiliated Jihad cells secreted throughout our nation that are poised to strike.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq

1 posted on 03/10/2003 7:33:30 PM PST by politicalpal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: politicalpal
Salman Pak is a terrorist training center approximately 85 kliks southeast of Baghdad, where modern passenger jets were parked to train terrorists in methods of taking over such planes (there are al Qaeda operatives now being held in Gitmo who have corroberated this because they've been trained the thwarted plan to hijack several airliners and down them near the Phillipines had one or more hijackers trained at Salman Pak).

Saddam is a weapons and financial supporter of Hamas and the Palestinian suicide murderers.

Saddam's son is a friend with one of Usama's sons; Usama's son came to the birthday party for Uday (I think that's the Saddam son of note).

Saddam sent members of his secret service to Afghanistan to train al Qaeda terrorists in the handling and use of bio and chemical weapons. ... Saddam has killed millions of his own countrymen and neighboring nationals (Iranis and Kuwaitis).

Saddam has vowed to eliminate Israel in the Middle East, as the modern-day Salladin to the arabs.

Saddam stopped our advance to Baghdad in 1991 by issuing the fianl threat to gas and poison Israel with his (then, but not now) unstoppable scud missles, if we advanced beyond Mutla Ridge in Kuwait.

An Iraqi secret service person met with Atta in Prague, as first denied that government intel folks, then verified by Havel.

There is more, of a financial tie to terrorism world-wide, but the above should be better known to the American people. Screw the French, Germans, Russians, Chinese, and Kofi Anan, they already know all this and still choose to support this murderous bastard. Time to decapitate the Beast in Baghdad and his Ba'athist party of ghouls and thugs.

2 posted on 03/10/2003 7:52:11 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I'll pass this info on.
3 posted on 03/10/2003 8:05:58 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Saddam stopped our advance to Baghdad in 1991 by issuing the fianl threat to gas and poison Israel with his (then, but not now) unstoppable scud missles, if we advanced beyond Mutla Ridge in Kuwait.

I have heard others mention this here, but a threat of Saddam using missles against Isreal is not why the war ended.

US troops where less then 70 miles from Baghdad when Pres. Bush announced a ceasefire on Feb 28, 1991. The decision had been made to leave Saddam in power with a limited army so that he could keep Iran in check. Gen. Schwartzkopf was against this and wanted to take Baghdad. At the time Saddam complied with a Russian peace plan and had started to pull his troops out of Kuwait a few days earlier and agreed to accept all 12 UN resolutions. Pres. Bush declared victory. There wasn't much left for him to use in any significant way against isreal.

Even after the cease fire had been issued, OPERATIONS ORDER FRAGOS FEB 91 said that "SA UNITS CONTINUE WITH OFFENSIVE OPERATIONS AS PLANNED TO DESTROY ENEMY ARMORED VEHICLES. MAKE MAXIMUM USE OF AH-64'S AND AIR FORCE ASSETS.
B(U)@@ CEASE-F3:RE COMMENCES 28050OZ FEB 91.
CiLI70+@ CEASE-FIRE DOES NOT PROHIBIT DESTRUCTION OF BY-PASSED ENEKY EQUIPMENT AND MILITARY FACILITIES."

At that point we where also in possetion of a number of CB weapons in western and southern Iraq and guidelines had been issued on their handling.

SUBJECT: CAPTURED CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL MUNITIONS (U)
A. SECRET MSG, CDR, XVIII ABN CORPS, G3, 241905Z FEB 91, SUBJ:
DESTRUCTION/RETROGRADE OF ENEMY EQUIPMENT. (U)(NOTAL) *B. SECRET MSG, COMUSARCENT MAIN, G3i 23202OZ FEB 91, SUBJ:
CAPTURED OR ABANDONED CHEM/BIO MUNITIONS. (U)(NOTAL)

Any working SCUD's Saddam had would not have been very effective as a means of CB delivery. The Iraqi military used 250kg and 500kg bombs, and 55 gal drums for helicopter drops (from 3-4K feet) as well as air sprayers on helicopters with 2 1000 liter tanks. All carried mustard, tabun or sarin. While the SCUD was originally designed to carry a 2000lb warhead 100-150 miles, In order to reach Isreal the warhead would have to be less then 150kg.
4 posted on 03/10/2003 10:08:08 PM PST by gaucho ("There is no Hell, there is only France." Frank Zappa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson