Skip to comments.
CLINTON IS EVEN ODDS TO BE APPROVED AS THE NEXT SECRETARY GENERAL
Pittburgh Tribune ^
| Re-Print March 10, 2003 Original Feb 16, 2003
Posted on 03/10/2003 8:33:32 AM PST by kinghorse
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:02:49 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Once again the future of Bill Clinton has become a hot topic that rivals
(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antichrist; clinton; secgenclinton; un; worldgovernment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-119 next last
To: kinghorse
66610
61
posted on
03/10/2003 9:14:51 AM PST
by
putupon
(Boycot Michelin/Goodrich (Fr) and Contiental/General (Ger) Tires, & FStone, US but they suk)
To: GovernmentShrinker
Dont forget Libya on the Human Rights Council and Syria as head of the Security Council...... what an EMBARRASSING circus..
62
posted on
03/10/2003 9:15:04 AM PST
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
Comment #63 Removed by Moderator
To: Paleo Conservative
According to the UN Charter, no citizen of one of the permanent members of the Security Council can hold the position of Secretary General of the UN. All depends on your definition of is.... We've heard that rules don't apply to Clinton.
64
posted on
03/10/2003 9:16:16 AM PST
by
PetroniDE
(Zimmerman Telegram (1917) - Pearl Harbor (1941) - WTC (2001) - NEVER AGAIN...)
To: kinghorse
Have they installed new sinks in the SG's office yet?
-Eric
65
posted on
03/10/2003 9:16:21 AM PST
by
E Rocc
("When Kuwait was invaded, no one called Sweden" - P. J. O'Rourke)
To: dd5339
The US would either have to pull out of the UN or clintoon would have to renounce his US citizenship. If he renounced his US citizenship, he could be banned from US territory.
To: kinghorse
I think this is a great idea. I hope he does it.
It'd be nice to have both targets together, in the same boat.
67
posted on
03/10/2003 9:17:52 AM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: GovernmentShrinker
Oops, "that this guy" = "hate this guy"
To: kinghorse
from the U.N. Secretary General's history home page:
Under the Charter, the Secretary-General is appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council...
Sounds like the USA has a veto over the appointment of theBentOne as SG.
Who says elections don't matter? Vote Republican.
69
posted on
03/10/2003 9:20:05 AM PST
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm SO glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government.)
To: PetroniDE
We don't even have to veto this one...there is a rule in the charter that no one from the big 5 can be the UN chief. Its generally always a 3rd world guy who was a college president. I can't see what Bill intends to do as UN chief...there is no function to it...but you would get alot of interns...perhaps thats the main focus here.
To: E. Pluribus Unum; dd5339; litany_of_lies; DSH
If you check out the fine print on the UN Charter you should see that no citizen of a permanent member of the Security Council can be a Secretary General. The US would either have to pull out of the UN or clintoon would have to renounce his US citizenship. You happen to have a specific citation to that "fine print" in the U.N. Charter? 'cause I've never been able to find it, and I've looked.
Hmm... not so fast.. I've had a pretty careful read of that charter as well, and I'll be darned if I can find any such preclusion.
UN Charter Document
And I wouldn't put this past Clinton, the little publicity-mad b*st*rd. Yeah, it's just like him to go for this tasty tid-bit and there's little anyone in the US can do to stop him. I can neither explain nor understand the charisma of this oaf but somehow he's got it and knows how to use it - wherever he goes a huge cadre of silly idiots mindlessly follows behind him like a wake behind an ocean liner.
Yes, WJC will very likely get this appointment because there's nothing standing in his way. Don't suppose Bill's got a chance of having a suddenly bad heart or other critical illness anytime soon? I think God's intervention is the only way to stop him at this point (although HE has not been terribly helpful so far, so I've little hope there, either.)
The world really is going in the toilet. Sigh.
71
posted on
03/10/2003 9:23:16 AM PST
by
In The Defense of Liberty
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: sheik yerbouty
"Bill the Beast"? Does anyone really know who his father really was? Obviously, the Antichrist.
To: pepsionice
there is a rule in the charter that no one from the big 5 can be the UN chief.I thought that was the case, too, but I cannot find it written anywhere. (not that a plain rule would prevent the Bent One from ignoring it.)
73
posted on
03/10/2003 9:30:20 AM PST
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm SO glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
74
posted on
03/10/2003 9:30:35 AM PST
by
qwertyz
To: Paleo Conservative
I don't see anything like that in the charter found
here.
75
posted on
03/10/2003 9:31:04 AM PST
by
FourPeas
To: pepsionice
Tells you how much I know about the UN Charter. Then again, judging by their performance, the only thing the UN Charter seems to be good for is when you go fishing and run out of "hygiene paper".
76
posted on
03/10/2003 9:32:51 AM PST
by
PetroniDE
(Zimmerman Telegram (1917) - Pearl Harbor (1941) - WTC (2001) - NEVER AGAIN...)
To: kinghorse
"Ain't" gonna happen.
77
posted on
03/10/2003 9:33:10 AM PST
by
verity
To: cardinal4
Since when did the Clintons care about rules? They make up their own rules.
To: kinghorse
Bill "Nicholae Carpathia" Clinton
79
posted on
03/10/2003 9:36:54 AM PST
by
showme_the_Glory
(No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anyone got a peanut.....)
To: kinghorse
That takes money the kind of money only the long-suffering U.S. taxpayer can give, plus a cash-grabbing fund-raiser. The Congress would be likely to totally defund the UN if Clinton were the General Secretary.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-119 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson