[AppyPappy]

So I don't see the urgency to save a poor disabled vet who is sitting on a $Million plus. I think this is one of those Libertarian "theory" issues.

[TonyWojo]

You seem to be overly obsessed with money. Possibly you are the one living in squalor.

[AAABEST]

Possibly you are the one living in squalor.

I think you're on to something Tony. My guess is AP is that posting from communist China. They all live in squalor over there.

[ksen]

I think this is one of those Libertarian "theory" issues.

You mean the Libertarian "theory" of private property?

[teeman8r]

government seizing private property should be the concern of all citizens, your "theory issue" may be rethought when the government comes for your property and their is no legal precedent to stop them... libertarian or otherwise.

my property is being threatened under the nontidal wetland regulations, that can delegate drainage ditches as nontidal wetlands, with criminal fines of noncompliance of $500.00 a day, and nothing for complying... accept the ability to pay taxes on property i cannot do anything with, ie farm, till, harvest trees...

fight on homesteader....

teeman

[zip]

So I don't see the urgency to save a poor disabled vet who is sitting on a $Million plus

If I had a 50,000 dollar car and the state offered me 1,000 dollars for it, would you say I had to take it? There is no difference in this case. First, the state is only offering 25 to 30 percent of the value of the property, second, the value of the land is further enhanced by the selling of fill, and third,(and most important) HE DOESN'T WANT TO SELL. PERIOD.

[Liberal Classic]

So I don't see the urgency to save a poor disabled vet who is sitting on a $Million plus. I think this is one of those Libertarian "theory" issues.

Some things are more important than money.

[wgeorge2001]

"So I don't see the urgency to save a poor disabled vet who is sitting on a $Million plus. I think this is one of those Libertarian "theory" issues."

I don't think you understand the true nature of the issue here. The boundries of eminent domain would seem to be the basis of dispute here; not the money. The landowner want's to keep his land. The greenies ,a leftist political group of people who have chosen to disregard and destroy our constitution through the use of trial lawyers and despicable left wing politicians,communists,socialists,marxists,eliteists,and deceived sheeple, wants to steal his land under the guise of eminent domain, as they are and have been doing throughout America for many years now. The land is not necessary for public domain and therefore he should not be pushed off his land.