Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hank Kerchief
The fallacy in your arrogant approach is the fact that sleep, which you define as total unconsciousness, is an absolutely necessary precursive condition for the occurence of measurable consciousness.
41 posted on 03/09/2003 6:04:02 PM PST by GopherIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: GopherIt; MHGinTN
The fallacy in your arrogant approach is the fact that sleep, which you define as total unconsciousness, is an absolutely necessary precursive condition for the occurence of measurable consciousness.

I do not recall defining sleep as, "total unconsciousness," because it seldom is, although comatose states probably are. I know that most have missed my point, so I will state it clearly. Suppose it is proved the unborn absolutely do not experience what we mean by conscious pain, at any stage?

Does that make any difference? Does that make abortion OK?

If you keep making these specious arguments against abortion, you are helping the pro-abortion movement. Is that what you want?

Abortion is wrong, it is harmful to all involved, it is a complete distortion of all that sex, and love, and life, and morality, and motherhood are about. But I am afraid, the biggest promoters of abortion are those who fancy themselves as "pro-life."

Hank

74 posted on 03/09/2003 7:18:25 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson