Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billbears
But take care of issues that are closer to a Constitutional definition of war (North Korea) instead of first involving ourselves in another war on something.

Unlike NK, Iraq doesn't yet have nukes, so we can afford to take Saddam out without fighting a potentially debilitating nuclear war. An invasion of NK right now would probably kill 1 million+ So. Koreans, and there's a possibility that Kim could successfuly fire off an ICMB at the U.S. west coast, killing 100,000+ Americans and turning our economy to dust. Please tell us all your plan for dealing with what is turning out to be the most egregious of Clinton's errors.

There just aren't any good options as far as dealing with NK is concerned right now. Taking out Saddam before he attains their capacities is something we can do with far less risk. In the meantime, perhaps we should rush development of our new ABM technology -- we might be needing it in the not-too-distant future.

64 posted on 03/09/2003 5:16:55 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Mojo
ICMB = ICBM
68 posted on 03/09/2003 5:21:51 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson