Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea: U.S. Plans Nuclear Attack
AP ^ | March 9, 2003 | JAE-SUK YOO

Posted on 03/09/2003 11:10:15 AM PST by Indy Pendance

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) -- North Korea on Sunday accused the United States of plotting an atomic attack against it, continuing the communist North's hostile rhetoric in the standoff over its moves to develop nuclear programs.

Chief U.N. nuclear inspector Mohamed ElBaradei warned that the world must not tolerate the North's ambitions and said in an interview that "all countries must be treated equally."

When asked whether North Korea poses a greater threat than Iraq, ElBaradei told the German weekly newspaper Bild am Sonntag that "in both cases, we are worried about the proliferation of nuclear weapons."

"The difference is that, in Iraq, we can now check with a team of highly qualified inspectors whether there is a new nuclear weapons program," said ElBaradei, who heads the Vienna, Austria-based International Atomic Energy Agency.

"In North Korea, IAEA inspectors were forced out of the country in December, and we know that North Korea is in a position to produce weapons-grade plutonium."

The nuclear dispute flared in October when Washington said Pyongyang admitted pursuing a nuclear program.

Washington and its allies cut off oil shipments to the impoverished communist state. The North retaliated by expelling U.N. monitors, moving to reactivate its frozen nuclear facilities and withdrawing from the global Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

In recent months, the isolated North has taken steps to restart its plutonium-production line at a mothballed reactor, and expelled U.N. inspectors who were monitoring the shutdown reactor.

ElBaradei's agency has sent the dispute to the U.N. Security Council, and while Washington says it wants to settle the dispute diplomatically, it has not ruled out a military option.

North Korea claims the Bush administration is planning pre-emptive strikes on its military bases and nuclear facilities, which U.S. officials believe are being used to make atomic bombs.

On Sunday, its state KCNA news agency said the U.S. Department of Defense mapped out a plan including "not only cruise missile strikes and massive air raids, etc., but the use of tactical nuclear weapons."

The North's "army and people will take every possible self-defensive measure to cope with the U.S. bellicose forces' new war moves," it said.

Tensions between Pyongyang and Washington increased last week after North Korean fighter jets intercepted a U.S. reconnaissance plane over the sea between the Korean Peninsula and Japan.

U.S. officials believe Pyongyang may be preparing to test fire another missile soon, following the launch of an anti-ship missile off its east coast late last month.

The Pentagon is deploying 12 B-1 and 12 B-52 bombers to Guam, about 2,000 miles from North Korea in case of conflict in the region.

"These moves indicate that the U.S. Air Force is taking the lead in implementing the U.S. imperialists' strategy to mount a pre-emptive attack on (North Korea)," said Pyongyang's official Rodong Sinmun newspaper.

Meanwhile, U.S. officials demanded that Pyongyang dismantle its nuclear facilities in Yongbyon during unofficial talks in Germany last month, a major Japanese daily said Sunday.

U.S. diplomats also called for Pyongyang to allow U.N. monitors to return to verify that it wasn't enriching uranium for its purported nuclear weapons program during the meetings at the North Korean Embassy in Berlin on Feb. 20-21, the Asahi newspaper reported.

North Korea rejected the demands and the meetings ended in disagreement, the paper said, citing an unidentified former U.S. official who attended the meeting. Pyongyang had proposed a visit by U.S. nuclear inspectors, it said.

U.S. officials were not immediately available for comment Sunday.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 03/09/2003 11:10:15 AM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Nuke them before they nuke US.
2 posted on 03/09/2003 11:11:48 AM PST by Lexington Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
So it has been since negotiations for the cease fire began.
3 posted on 03/09/2003 11:13:06 AM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
North Korea on Sunday accused the United States of plotting an atomic attack against it

Not at all. However we are exploring the utility of creating the Island Nation of South Korea.

Wink, wink, nudge, nudge. Say no more!

4 posted on 03/09/2003 11:17:03 AM PST by LibKill (VIOLENCE! The supreme authority from which all other authority is derived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green
bump and we must stop toying with the commies and stop them now.
5 posted on 03/09/2003 11:19:08 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
The N. Koreans are a complete bunch of Whack Jobs!
6 posted on 03/09/2003 11:27:47 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
You know what; if North Korea is going to keep blabbing all of our military secrets to the AP, we should just stop telling them when we're going to launch a nuclear strike. Sheesh.
7 posted on 03/09/2003 11:29:10 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
I like the abbreviation No Korea. NO being the key word.

Why not just Korea. After all I own a Daewoo and the wife a Hyundai!
8 posted on 03/09/2003 11:36:33 AM PST by silverNblackcuban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
A run on marshmallows and sunscreen has been reported.
9 posted on 03/09/2003 11:39:25 AM PST by Starrgaizr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Indy Pendance
The NKs are begging to be nuked, and they might very well get what they're asking for.
11 posted on 03/09/2003 11:57:15 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Ping. In case you haven't seen this.
12 posted on 03/09/2003 12:01:34 PM PST by Semper911 (For some people, bread and circus are not enough. Hence, FreeRepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
It's driving them nuts that GW's not falling to his knees and begging them to play nice like Pee Wee Clinton and his team did. GW might be a "moron" and a "cowboy" but he's sure got all the world's geniuses buffaloed.

Kim, Chirac, Schroeder, Hussein, Putin, and all the other heads of state are learning GW doesn't appreciate threats of any kind.

GW's got our troops all dressed up and ready to party . . . and he'll eventually dance with anyone crazy enough to try and cut in.

13 posted on 03/09/2003 12:11:33 PM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
See? The trolls in Pongyang are afraid, as they should be.
14 posted on 03/09/2003 12:24:19 PM PST by rageaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
>>North Korea on Sunday accused the United States of plotting an atomic attack against it<<

I certainly hope so...

15 posted on 03/09/2003 12:28:24 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
I say that we pull completely out of the area and watch it burn from afar. The S. Koreans hate our guts as much as the N. Koreans do. I remember getting explicit instructions from my CO to only frequent US friendly places due to the hatred the S. Koreans show to their saviours. He said it was not uncommen to find urin or feces in your food if you went to a "blacklisted" place.

Anyone that has been there knows that it is a rock filled, hell hole. I see no reason protecting those who hate us so much. Am I alone in this reasoning?
16 posted on 03/09/2003 12:31:15 PM PST by CavScoutNC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble; PetroniDE
Ahhh.. I hopping up and down and almost wet myself..
KIMJONGIL is big military power, look over here, President Bush!
Look! Right here! See me hopping? You no pay attention!


17 posted on 03/09/2003 12:41:48 PM PST by humblegunner (Haze gray and underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
I hate to repeat myself, but this is from an earlier thread on the same topic.




Mr Roh campaigned on a platform of not needing or wanting such an american presence in the South anymore. Now that the North is doing a bit of saber-rattling, he's backing off. I think Rumselfd should FORCE the countries in the region to confront North Korea, including the South (who WANTS reunification with the Norht), China, and Russia, and Japan.

His comments seem not only rational to Americans, but may just make the South take some initiative and talk with China and Russia about maybe helping them with this little problem they've encountered since the new administration ran on an anti-US platform!!




And perhaps we can just stay out of this for a while.
18 posted on 03/09/2003 12:46:21 PM PST by bart99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CavScoutNC
I pretty much agree with you...... if we aren't wanted, then let's get out and let the local countries deal with the problem.
19 posted on 03/09/2003 12:48:53 PM PST by bart99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CavScoutNC
I agree with you. Besides, things have changed since 1950. We can cause so much havoc from the air that we could make invading SK incredibly painful for the NK's without a single American on the ground, certainly without 37,000. Also, Korea -- unlike, e.g., Afghanistan, has miles and miles of coastline where we could land troops easily if the need ever arose.

If the SK's don't want us there, let's go.

20 posted on 03/09/2003 1:01:58 PM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson