Skip to comments.
DAWN OF THE AIRBORNE LASER
popular science ^
| march-2003
| by Mark Farmer
Posted on 03/09/2003 10:48:30 AM PST by green team 1999
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: *miltech
To: green team 1999
this is so cool!
3
posted on
03/09/2003 11:07:15 AM PST
by
ffusco
("Essiri sempri la santu fora la chiesa.")
To: green team 1999
Can we call it The Zeus Missile defense system?
4
posted on
03/09/2003 11:13:18 AM PST
by
ffusco
("Essiri sempri la santu fora la chiesa.")
To: ffusco
I submit we call it the Zot!
To: ffusco
Obviously - ZOT is the right name!
6
posted on
03/09/2003 11:21:56 AM PST
by
RandyRep
To: ffusco
Wait until they can fit one inside an F-22 that can take out air to air missles and SAMs. A team of those teamed with regular fighters would be unstoppable.
To: green team 1999
SHAZAAM!
8
posted on
03/09/2003 11:22:38 AM PST
by
Thom Pain
To: green team 1999; snopercod; RightWhale; Physicist; joanie-f
OK. So ...
During the World Series, at Yankee Stadium, a New York Yankee appears to "knock one out of the park!"
But from nearby La Guardia Field, an Atlanta Braves fan and nephew of Ted Turner's, piloting Ted Turner's private 747-400F, fires his ABL at the baseball and fries it crisp --- it's ashes --- just before the baseball would have gone over the center field wall.
Is it a home run or not?
(For the purposes of discussion, disregard the forest fires set all along the turnpikes north to Poughkeepsie and the burning barricks roofs at West Point.)
To: ffusco
#4. This system is much more mobile and flexible than the Nike Zeus system of the late 50's early 60's. The same can be said of the Spartan system. ABL is much more mobile and flexible.
10
posted on
03/09/2003 11:26:25 AM PST
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: green team 1999
God bless Ronald Reagan.
11
posted on
03/09/2003 11:26:52 AM PST
by
mgstarr
To: clueless idiot
I submit we call it the Zot! I wish I had said that.
12
posted on
03/09/2003 11:27:13 AM PST
by
LibKill
(VIOLENCE! The supreme authority from which all other authority is derived.)
To: green team 1999
the central component in the now-abandoned Star Wars program floated during the Reagan administration. The technological breakthroughs generated by that failed program were folded into the ABL effort. Gorbychev himself stated that Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative--and Reagan's refusal to bargain it away--were decisive in the chain of events leading to the fall of the USSR. In what sense, then, was SDI a "failed program?" The more so now that the program has a spinoff in active development, the true "failure" was of the administration which abandoned SDI in the first instance. Wonder who that was???!
To: green team 1999
It has taken decades of similar engineering advances to make the ABL feasible. The military has been noodling around with laser weapons since the early days of the cold war. The United States and the former Soviet Union both conducted experiments with nuclear-powered naval and satellite-based lasers, all intended to bring down intercontinental ballistic missiles and bombers. Eventually, the idea became the central component in the now-abandoned Star Wars program floated during the Reagan administration. The technological breakthroughs generated by that failed program were folded into the ABL effort. Something tells me the author is a liberal Democrat.
To: First_Salute
Interference
15
posted on
03/09/2003 11:30:12 AM PST
by
error99
("I believe stupidity should hurt."...used by permission from null and void all copyrights apply...)
To: mgstarr
I submit we call it the Ronald Ray-Gun !
16
posted on
03/09/2003 11:30:58 AM PST
by
error99
("I believe stupidity should hurt."...used by permission from null and void all copyrights apply...)
To: First_Salute
Ground rules double.
17
posted on
03/09/2003 11:31:09 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
To: green team 1999
18
posted on
03/09/2003 11:31:24 AM PST
by
backhoe
(North Korean Nukes, Hamas, OBL, 9-11... some "legacy" Clinton left us...))
To: Jonathon Spectre
millions for defense, not one cent for tribute ping...
To: First_Salute
No. Because the ball should be considered as hitting an object in the field of play. The fact that it disappeared afterward would be a matter for baseball theologians and their lawyers.
Result: possibly counting as a strike against the batter.
20
posted on
03/09/2003 11:38:09 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson