Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moscow warns US on unilateral Iraq strike as Baghdad scraps more missiles
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/world/afp.html ^ | Sunday March 9, 10:45 AM

Posted on 03/08/2003 8:58:48 PM PST by luv2ndamend

Russia warned Washington that it would be violating the United Nations Charter if it attacked Iraq without a UN mandate, as Baghdad destroyed more banned missiles and warheads under UN supervision.

Iraq's push for disarmament compliance followed a draft resolution given the UN Security Council Friday by the United States, Britain and Spain, which would give Baghdad a March 17 deadline to fully disarm or face military action.

Although the resolution -- with three of the five veto-wielding council members against it -- stood little chance of passage, US President George W. Bush reiterated his resolve to go to war alone.

"We don't really need United Nations approval," he said late in the week, although his government says it would much prefer to have the approval of the international community.

Russia labelled the March 17 line in the sand unnecessary and unjustified and echoed a threat from France, which also has a veto on the council, to block any resolution authorising the use of force.

Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov warned that "if the United States unilaterally launched a military strike on Iraq without a UN mandate, it would be in violation of the UN charter," in which case the Security Council would have to "make appropriate decisions."

In Baghdad, the UN inspectors' spokesman said Iraq had scrapped a further six of its banned Al-Samoud 2 missiles after a day's pause, raising to 40 the number of the missiles destroyed since the operation began a week ago.

"Six more Al-Samoud 2 missiles were destroyed, along with three warheads," spokesman Hiro Ueki said.

Iraqi officials have said about 100 of the rockets were made.

Bush derided those efforts as a "willful charade" to thwart UN inspectors.

He also rejected an assessment by chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix that the destruction of the banned missiles represented "substantial" disarmament.

"Our intelligence shows that even as he (Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein) is destroying these few missiles, he has ordered the continued production of the very same type of missiles," Bush said in his weekly radio address.

Iraq described Blix's report as "fair" and in return demanded the lifting of the embargo slapped on it for invading Kuwait in 1990, Iraqi television quoted an official as saying.

The latest draft resolution challenges the Security Council either to declare Iraq in full compliance with UN demands on disarmament by March 17 or to authorise war.

The resolution, amended at the last minute to give Iraq more time, was seen as a bid to turn the tables on France, Germany, Russia, China and Syria. They have locked horns with Britain, Spain and the United States, who are pushing the resolution authorising the use of force.

The amendment states that Baghdad will not have fulfilled its UN disarmament obligations unless "the Security Council concludes that Iraq has demonstrated full, unconditional, immediate and active cooperation" by March 17.

The impending war on Iraq also upstaged International Womens Day, with peace demonstrations taking the limelight at rallies across Europe, the United States and beyond.

Tens of thousands meanwhile took to the streets of European cities protesting against a military strike on Iraq, with Italians burning president Bush in efigy, and an English bishop insisting there was no moral justification for an attack.

European women from Yerevan to Lisbon protested against war on Iraq.

Tens of thousands protested outside a US military base near Pisa in northern Italy, burning an uniformed effigy of Bush.

Leftwing parliamentary deputies were among those who gathered outside US Camp Darby, with organisers estimating the crowd at 60,000 people and the police 20,000 people.

The Italian government has sided with the hardline camp in the Iraqi crisis, arguing that Baghdad should be disarmed by force if necessary, while polls show much of the country's population opposed to war.

Thousands across Germany called on Bush to respect the opinions of the hundreds of millions across the world who oppose a military solution to disarming Iraq of alleged weapons of mass destruction.

In Stuttgart some 300 people held a sit-in outside the US army's European Command.

Clad in pink and chanting peace songs, demonstrators marked International Women's Day outside the White House, where conservative counter-demonstrators urged them to find husbands and stop nagging.

"Get back in the kitchen," Pastor Mark Hines yelled at the women of the Codepink group, named as a spoof of the color-coding system the United States uses to describe the level of alert for terrorist threats.

"We are here because the world needs to know there are American voices that oppose the rush to war," said Shira Keyes, a gray-haired woman clad in pink.

"If we continue to rely on wars to resolve our differences, we will never truly be a just society," said 23-year-old Anne Claire Marshall, wearing a pink wig.

Meanwhile a London newspaper reported Sunday that British and US airborne troops are planning a lightning assault on Baghdad's Saddam International Airport as part of an offensive to overrun the Iraqi capital within 72 hours of an outbreak of war.

British paratroopers from 16 Air Assault Brigade will support US soldiers from the 101st and 82nd Airborne Divisions in any airport assault, The Sunday Telegraph said, without indicating its sources.

The Telegraph said any assault on the airport would begin in the hours after the launch of war. Combat jets armed with satellite-guided bombs would first destroy air defence sites and troops guarding the airfield before paratroopers or heliborne troops jumped down from a height of 250 feet (75 metres).


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2003 8:58:48 PM PST by luv2ndamend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: luv2ndamend
yes we are very concerned bout the security council.. after this bullshit last six months... I don't think there will be anything but one veto after another from Britain, the USA and Spain...

Sec Council is dead.
Furthermore... we will STAYin just to veto their crap... while NOT paying our dues... like the rest of the third world nations don't... russia, south africa and angola...
3 posted on 03/08/2003 9:05:18 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
So true!
4 posted on 03/08/2003 9:06:13 PM PST by luv2ndamend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
Violating the United Nations Charter? Golly, I hope they don't punish us as harshly as they have Iraq.
5 posted on 03/08/2003 9:10:31 PM PST by watchin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
They would be sweet - the security council seeks to pass a resolution rebuking the USA - and the USA vetoes it. I'd giggle for weeks.
6 posted on 03/08/2003 9:12:35 PM PST by watchin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
I'm beginning to wonder if maybe Germany, France and Russia aren't secretly planning to attack the U.S. when we free the Iraqi people. I cannot, for the life of me, understand why these countries are so dead set against stopping terrorist aggression. There's more going on here than meets the eye, I fear.
7 posted on 03/08/2003 9:13:37 PM PST by 3catsanadog (When anything goes, everything will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
I hope the whole thing is quick and clean, the people of Iraq are demanding of the world "What the heck took you so long?" and we find all kinds of nasty stuff in underground bunkers.........that would be sooooo sweeet
8 posted on 03/08/2003 9:14:50 PM PST by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
BWAHAHAHAHAHA

What the US is supposed to be afraid of the Security Council now after dicking around with Saddam for 11 years?

Powell should bitch slap the ambassadors of Russia, France & Germany and make them like it.
9 posted on 03/08/2003 9:16:23 PM PST by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
I smell Russian or French Para-Troops in Baghdad soon.
10 posted on 03/08/2003 9:17:24 PM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
Sorry, Igor. We've already got the necessary mandate. It's called UN Resolution 1441.
11 posted on 03/08/2003 9:17:46 PM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
The Commies, er, Russians and their friends the Germans and the French may give us some grief in the UN but they in turn will lose billions in canceled contracts from Iraq after it attains freedom.

12 posted on 03/08/2003 9:20:07 PM PST by vishnu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Robert_Paulson2
Sec Council is dead. Furthermore... we will STAYin just to veto their crap... while NOT paying our dues... like the rest of the third world nations don't... russia, south africa and angola...

...and we will stay in just to chase them around the halls of their statist skyscraper.

14 posted on 03/08/2003 9:23:05 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
I wonder if everyone would feel more comfortable with the USA if we began to disarm? Surely we could find 10 or 12 old missiles to destroy before we go in and demolish the place.
15 posted on 03/08/2003 9:25:17 PM PST by watchin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
It's not unilateral. It's multilateral with dozens of nations supporting and participating. Russia, France and Germany are partakers of Saddam's cup of mass murder. They are the parties in breach of world norms.
16 posted on 03/08/2003 9:27:50 PM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spruce
I smell Russian or French Para-Troops in Baghdad soon.

Another good reason for Bush to issue the "go" order now.

17 posted on 03/08/2003 9:27:58 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
This is just proof that Cheney and Rummy were correct in saying that going with the UN was a trap. I hope that Powell has learned a lesson from this.
18 posted on 03/08/2003 9:28:11 PM PST by SirChas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: watchin
Violating the United Nations Charter? Golly, I hope they don't punish us as harshly as they have Iraq.

ROFLMAO!

19 posted on 03/08/2003 9:30:25 PM PST by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spruce
Yeah, I fear a "Pristina" airport scenario also. But I think we won't back down this time, and there's no way the Russians can get any significant assets into the country unless the go overland through Iran.

And after they saw how our weaponry chews through Russian armor, I don't think they'll be too enthusiastic.

20 posted on 03/08/2003 9:32:46 PM PST by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson