Skip to comments.
UN plan to give Saddam 72 hours to leave Baghdad
Sunday Herald ^
| 3/8/03
Posted on 03/08/2003 7:47:00 PM PST by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
To: areafiftyone
If this is true, France et al blinked. They do not want us in there finding all of their invoices.
To: areafiftyone
22
posted on
03/08/2003 8:05:05 PM PST
by
TSgt
(“If I do my full duty, the rest will take care of itself.” - General George S. Patton)
To: areafiftyone; RobFromGa
Saddam knows if he leaves he's a dead man.
23
posted on
03/08/2003 8:05:30 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
To: ET(end tyranny)
The Iraqi generals and top ranking officers would have to co-operate fully with UN inspectors to oversee the total elimination of
any weapons of mass destruction.
They just don't get it.
24
posted on
03/08/2003 8:05:39 PM PST
by
calljack
To: Howlin
What I don't get is why would Pakistan table it? I thought they were our friend?
25
posted on
03/08/2003 8:05:46 PM PST
by
marajade
To: All
Anyone but me get the impression the UN is thinking that they are gonna be left holding the bag after the US goes in without them, and now they are scrambling to grab whatever they can? "The UN Controlling the Oil Fields" etc, instead of the Iraqi people controlling their own oil.
I'm thinking that the UN is worried that they might not be viewed in the best light ( wonder why ?) by the recently liberated people of Iraq. Hmm...wonder who the people of Iraq would be more inclined to sell their oil to, those who freed them, or those who conspired against them?
By the way, I'm not arguing this is a "war for oil" just a byproduct of liberation. Any comments?
To: marajade
I have lost all track of who is what and with who.
All I know is that they are in a full panic and trying like hell to stop what needs to be done.
They are going to kill us all.
27
posted on
03/08/2003 8:06:48 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
To: areafiftyone
the UN would oversee the establishment of a post-Saddam government and the UN, not the US, would take stewardship of Iraq's oilfields. This allows the UN to emerge victorious, prevents the US from taking a physical inventory of just what is in Iraq, and gives the UN a stream of income from the oil.
Sounds to me like the US has provided the courage, the leadership, and the troups, and at the last second the UN wants to come in and defeat us.
To: Dog Gone
the UN would oversee the establishment of a post-Saddam government and the UN, not the US, would take stewardship of Iraq's oilfields.
Ummm, couldn't the US just veto this part?
Bush to UN: Kick us out!
To: Howlin
The Beltway Boys reported tonite that Pakistan was leaning our way in the upcoming vote...
If that's true, this article might not be accurate...
30
posted on
03/08/2003 8:07:46 PM PST
by
marajade
To: areafiftyone
There is a disconnect between the talk of Saddam murdering and torturing thousands of his citizens, and the talk of his peaceful passage into exile. Would we really let someone so vile happily live out the rest of their lives in some palace bought with the blood money of thousands of innocent torture victims?
31
posted on
03/08/2003 8:08:11 PM PST
by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: FRgal4u
Bush fully supports exile of Hussein. If Hussein and other psychos from his family and Baath Party aren't ruling Iraq, it's a win for Bush.
To: areafiftyone
The next couple of weeks are going to be wild. Look for all kinds of deals and jockeying as Saddam tries to save his neck. It's going to be nerve-racking until we pull the trigger.
To: Howlin
BTW, did anybody ask them why, if Saddam is cooperating and disarming, this is necessary? Howlin, we're talking about the UN here, so there's no reason to start using logic. ;-)
34
posted on
03/08/2003 8:09:38 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Howlin
We've allowed ruthless dictators to leave power before. We'll let Hussein do so.
To: way-right-of-center
I agree 100 percent.
36
posted on
03/08/2003 8:10:04 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
To: areafiftyone; aculeus; general_re; MadIvan; Happygal
37
posted on
03/08/2003 8:10:43 PM PST
by
dighton
To: GraniteStateConservative
My point is HE will not leave.
38
posted on
03/08/2003 8:10:43 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
To: areafiftyone
I don't know how reliable this source is. Ivan, if you're out there - what say ye?
To: way-right-of-center
Anyone but me get the impression the UN is thinking that they are gonna be left holding the bag after the US goes in without them, and now they are scrambling to grab whatever they can? "The UN Controlling the Oil Fields" etc, instead of the Iraqi people controlling their own oil. Doesn't the UN control the funds from the Iraqi oil fields now? Maybe it is time for an audit.
40
posted on
03/08/2003 8:11:50 PM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Go away or I will replace you with a very small shell script)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson