I don't think your idea is so far-fetched. Notice how Clinton has conveniently reversed his position on Iraq from 1998, along with most of the democrats. They know that this is easily provable by looking up their former statements. Why come out so loudly and in print with this reversal?
If they simply disliked Bush but supported the policy, they could keep fairly quiet. If they didn't like the current policy and had changed their minds, they would be explaining WHY they changed their minds. Instead, they are acting as nuts as Scott Ritter, whicih leads me to believe they are as compromised as he is.
"Notice how Clinton has conveniently reversed his position on Iraq from 1998, along with most of the democrats."
Which makes you wonder why Hillary is still with Bush doesn't it?