To: snooker
In my opinion Blix is the entire problem with the UN. He has been giving cover for those who wish to vote against the amendment.
Maybe he is not the entire problem but close. I am getting very frustrated with the entire UN. Blix seems to be at the center of my frustration.
To: Irish Eyes
This is just a little much for me.
Blix set Powell up and tilted the whole SC meeting to a lie. What is going into these drones' tanks? The thousands of gallons of missing anthrax? VX, you pick it.
The discovery of one drone is enough to show clear intent. It also shows there is an active program to build and deploy them.
Disassemble a drone, put it in a cargo container, ship it to any US seaport, assemble, load, fly and dump. Doesn't take any rocket scientist to figure this out.
snooker
22 posted on
03/08/2003 4:14:26 PM PST by
snooker
To: Irish Eyes
It reminds me the time when Scott Ritter neglected to mention the child torture chambers in Iraq, because it might energize the forces that wanted to go to war. Ya think?
35 posted on
03/08/2003 4:21:06 PM PST by
fhayek
To: Irish Eyes
**He has been giving cover for those who wish to vote against the amendment.**
I think he's been getting paid by said people.
Prairie
178 posted on
03/08/2003 6:04:14 PM PST by
prairiebreeze
("We won't deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents" --GWBush)
To: Irish Eyes
There is no such thing regarding Iraq as an unbiased UN weapons of mass destruction inspector. There is no such thing as an unbiased UN. May all UNSC anti US delegates and their superiors become human canaries on the Iraqi battlefield to sense the presence first of chemical and biological weapons.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson