Posted on 03/08/2003 12:36:33 PM PST by Destro
Why the French behave as they do
Posted: March 5, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
Having rescued France in two world wars, Americans are puzzled. Why are they organizing the Security Council against us? Why are they sabotaging the president's plan to bring democracy to Iraq, as we restored democracy to France? Why are they doing this?
What the French are up to, however, is not unreasonable, if one can see the world from the perspective of Paris.
To understand what France is about, and perhaps deal with our French problem with more maturity than dumping champagne in the gutter, let us go back five centuries.
In 1500, there was born in Ghent a future king who would come to dominate the world as we do today. At six, the death of his father Philip of Hapsburg gave Charles the crown of the Netherlands. At 16, the death of his grandfather Ferdinand made him Charles I of Spain and of all its dependencies in Italy and America. At 19, the death of his grandfather Maximilian brought Charles all the hereditary lands of the Hapsburgs and the expectation of being elected Holy Roman Emperor.
In 1519, that title had been in the Hapsburg family four generations. Yet it remained an elective office. And two young and ambitious rulers challenged Charles for that title: Henry VIII of England and Francis I of France. Francis was by far the more formidable.
He set about bribing the electors. But Charles had access to the Medicis and the Fugger bank of Jacob the Rich, the strongest in Europe. Charles bought up more electors and was chosen Charles V, Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire.
France was surrounded. Charles ruled almost all of what is today's Spain, Holland, Belgium, Austria, Germany, Hungary and Italy, except for the Papal States. What did Francis, seething with resentment, do? Exactly what balance of power politics dictated. He began making alliances with the nations not under Charles' control, and went to war.
In 1525, Charles' armies crushed the French Army at Pavia and captured the French king. "Nothing is left to me," Francis I wrote to his mother, "except honor and life."
By agreeing to humiliating peace terms, Francis won his freedom and returned to France. There, he began preparing at once for a new war, winning the support of the pope and the Italian states that were coming to resent the dominance of the hegemonic Charles.
Defeated again, Francis made alliances with Scotland, Sweden and Denmark, with rebellious princes in Germany, even with the infidel Turks, an unprecedented act for a Christian king. Francis fought Charles until his death in 1547. Point of this history: For Francis I, read Jacques Chirac; for Charles V, read George W. Bush.
Again, consider the world from the Paris point of view.
French was once the language of every court in Europe. I speak German only to my horses, said Frederick the Great. But now, because the Americans speak English, English is the language of diplomacy, of the Internet and the Global Economy.
Once, French culture was predominant. Today, it is not even competitive. It is American television and cinema Europeans watch, American books, magazines and newspapers they read. The Cannes Film Festival cannot compete with the Academy Awards.
Jealous they have been displaced, resentful of having had to be twice rescued by the Americans, France is following the dictates of balance-of-power politics, trying to form up and head up a coalition of the resentful, who equally oppose America's military, economic and cultural hegemony.
When Americans began braying about being the "last superpower" and the "indispensable nation," and tossing our weight around all over the world, it was predictable that this would happen.
Now, the French are trying to assume the leadership of the anti-Americans, and there are hundreds of millions worldwide who would relish seeing the haughty Americans taken down. And with the Red Army back in Russia, France no longer needs us to defend her, nor does she need NATO as a constant reminder of her past dependency.
We brought this on ourselves. Had we packed up and come home after the Cold War, and dissolved NATO and other outdated alliances, America would today be the most courted country on earth.
Instead of our bribing nations to fight their wars, they would be begging us to defend them. Instead of our spending national treasure on bases all over the world, other nations would be buying our arms to defend themselves. Instead of yelling "Yankee, go home," they would be pleading, "Yankee, come back."
As has been said before, we Americans are lousy imperialists.
The sole consolation of our mismanaged diplomacy is that it is the harmless French who have taken up the anti-American banner, not a more formidable strategic rival like the Russians or Chinese.
Related Offer:
Buchanan's latest book is here! "The Death of the West" is an eye-opening exposé of how immigration invasions are endangering America. Both autographed and unautographed copies are now available at WorldNetDaily's online store!
Patrick J. Buchanan was twice a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination and the Reform Party’s candidate in 2000. He is also a founder and editor of the new magazine, The American Conservative. Now a commentator and columnist, he served three presidents in the White House, was a founding panelist of three national television shows, and is the author of seven books. See what else Pat Buchanan is doing these days.
I could live with that reason at least.
I'm still waiting for someone NOT coming from a left-wing peacenik point of view to convince me that finishing the Crusades is a bad idea. Better to do it now, than to leave it for our grandchildren. I'm glad my father's and grandfathers' generation beat down Germany when they did, rather than leaving it for me. Now, Germany is a toothless, gutless miserable excuse for a country, whining about our need for a just war. That's the victory that my elders fought for. I'd like my great-grandchildren to see only peaceful Muslims, or none at all.
"France has become ... irrelevant (( link )) --- to the great tasks that confront the Bush administration."
"Apart from providing us with fine perfumes, wines, and cheeses, the French are incapable of saving Western civilization. Nor do they really want to. That job has been left to us."
© 2003 Samuel Blumenfeld - All Rights Reserved
The French are COWARDS and SELFISH.
Nobody cares about how they got that way or why.
NEXT CASE
NEOCON? You got to be kidding? You're just a garden variety ISOLATIONIST, get out of the way.
Even if that was true before we committed ourselves to bringing Saddam down, it's no longer true. Failing to carry through on that commitment now would itself pose a greater threat to us than almost all other countries pose.
Maybe it was a mistake to commit ourselves. But if it was, it has already been made, irretrievably.
Oh, please, Pat -- put a sock in it.
Exactly--a realist would have paved a road with many exits a neocon ideologue sees the world narrowly and thus we find ourselves in this do or die situation.
Name them.
Saddam invades his neighbors.
Saddam uses WMDs against his neighbors and against his own people.
Saddam consorts with and supports islamic terrorists.
Saddam has violated the terms of our ceasefire with him and has done so for 12 years.
Saddam has made no secret of his intention to inflict harm on America.
These are the facts. And they are no less factual merely because somebody like Albright has agreed with them.
Thank God neither Buchanan nor you can persuade more than the aforesaid 17 people as to his position on anything. Nothing he or you think, write, or want will ever happen, in this world or the next. Praise be.
I justify my pro-Iraq mission @ #41
Notice the difference?
And BTW, while Bush's advisors do include neo-cons, so did Reagan's advisors. Does that make Bush and Reagan neo-cons too?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.