To: jammer
The next clause deals with warrants, so perhaps you meant some other clause.
If you did, it is not at all true that searches must be authorized by warrants to be reasonable, are warrants are de facto proof of reasonableness but are not required for some searches to be reasonable. For example, police arrest an armed man trying to escape after he robbed a store. Must they first get a warrant before searching him? Reasonable people say no.
To: Grand Old Partisan
Reasonable people don't equate catching someone during the commission of a crime with the constant monitoring of a citizenry whose "probable cause" to commit a crime is non-existent and, in fact, has not even been alleged.
9 posted on
03/08/2003 12:45:17 PM PST by
jammer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson