Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq demands lifting of sanctions after Blix report
Reuters | 3/08/03

Posted on 03/08/2003 4:59:48 AM PST by kattracks

BAGHDAD, March 8 (Reuters) - President Saddam Hussein called on the U.N. Security Council on Saturday to lift 12 years of sanctions against Iraq, declaring Baghdad had met its disarmament commitments.

In a statement after a meeting chaired by Saddam, the Iraqi leadership made a set of demands it said the Security Council should implement after the reports by chief weapons inspectors Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei on Friday.

"The embargo against Iraq should be lifted totally and comprehensively after America's motives were revealed to the world and after Iraq abided by Security Council resolutions," the statement said.

It also demanded that the Security Council denounce the United States and Britain as "liars", strip Israel of its alleged weapons of mass destruction and force it to pull out of "Palestine and occupied Arab land".

Chief U.N. inspector Hans Blix told the U.N. Security Council on Friday Iraq's cooperation fell short of Council demands but applauded Baghdad's scrapping of al-Samoud missiles.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chutzpah; gall; nerve; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2003 4:59:48 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
No problem. The US will be happy to support lifting the sanctions in a couple of weeks. . . .
2 posted on 03/08/2003 5:01:22 AM PST by TheConservator (Homines libenter quod volunt credunt--Julius Caesar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The man has huttzbah (sp?). Reminds me a LOT of clinton.
3 posted on 03/08/2003 5:03:54 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If you are in bed with terrorists and dictators, you live by the demands of terrorists and dictators. The demise of the U.N.
4 posted on 03/08/2003 5:04:35 AM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I see that Saddamy got his fresh supply of LSD.
'Cause he's trippin real good.
5 posted on 03/08/2003 5:05:02 AM PST by Delmarksman (Have you Sheiked your Mohammed lately?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Has Iraq just declared themselves in compliance with 1441?

That guarantees a return to the hyper-reluctant policy regarding destruction of WMD's, I would think. Those El Samoud missiles were the tip of an iceberg. Apparently, this is an announcement that there will never be a willing revelation of the extent of the iceberg.

Is this new to us? Of course not. However, perhaps there's the possibility that other nations believed Iraq was complying. That's highly doubtful -- Iraq's old european allies were probably just lying to others. But, just in case there were any who "believed" Iraq was cooperating, this announcement should be cold water in the face. Saddam has just announced himself in compliance.

And we've yet to see the first liter of anthrax.
6 posted on 03/08/2003 5:06:01 AM PST by xzins (Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twigs
chutzpah
7 posted on 03/08/2003 5:06:32 AM PST by TheConservator (Homines libenter quod volunt credunt--Julius Caesar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
declaring Baghdad had met its disarmament commitments.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!

Oh god, I needed a good laugh this morning.

8 posted on 03/08/2003 5:08:09 AM PST by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
It'll be interesting to see how/if the UN responds to this.

If they don't respond or reject the request, they've effectively admitted that Iraq is not yet in full compliance. If they accept it, I would think that more countries would be with us on the sand.

9 posted on 03/08/2003 5:08:15 AM PST by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'm sure the French would agree with Iraq on this.....
10 posted on 03/08/2003 5:08:28 AM PST by The Toad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Has Iraq just declared themselves in compliance with 1441?

They're only 4,238 days late and 100 Al-Samoud missiles, a few tons of anthrax, some uranium, etc., etc. short.

11 posted on 03/08/2003 5:11:14 AM PST by steveegg (12 years of inspections + 0 compliance = no peace ... 200,000 troops + 1 W = peace + liberation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Where's the BARF Alert for this one? Oh, I forgot, Iraq is being serious. I'm sure that Hans will be devoting a lot of time to this one.
12 posted on 03/08/2003 5:15:40 AM PST by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
France will probably present the formal motion to the UN...
13 posted on 03/08/2003 5:18:53 AM PST by paolop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Textide
Great point...lack of response from the UN or rejection of Saddam's claim surely would mean that the UN knows Saddam is lying.

Time to tell the UN to buzz off...let the rockets red glare
14 posted on 03/08/2003 5:19:49 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Its Not Hip To Be Janeane Garofolo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Onion right....
15 posted on 03/08/2003 5:19:52 AM PST by thepitts (we the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thepitts
The Onion right....

The next best thing for printed laughs, Reuters.

16 posted on 03/08/2003 5:20:54 AM PST by steveegg (12 years of inspections + 0 compliance = no peace ... 200,000 troops + 1 W = peace + liberation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior
Agreed. What difference does it make what the next U.N. resolution says? Saddam has already given his answer. I suggest we tee off at 5 p.m. EDT today.
17 posted on 03/08/2003 5:42:55 AM PST by We Happy Few ("we band of brothers; for he to-day that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother;")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
You say Hanukkah, I say Chanukah...
18 posted on 03/08/2003 5:43:32 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace ((the original))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
BAGHDAD, March 8 (Reuters) - President Saddam Hussein called on the U.N. Security Council on Saturday to lift 12 years of sanctions against Iraq, declaring Baghdad had met its disarmament commitments. In a statement after a meeting chaired by Saddam, the Iraqi leadership made a set of demands it said the Security Council should implement after the reports by chief weapons inspectors Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei on Friday. "The embargo against Iraq should be lifted totally and comprehensively after America's motives were revealed to the world and after Iraq abided by Security Council resolutions," the statement said. It also demanded that the Security Council denounce the United States and Britain as "liars", strip Israel of its alleged weapons of mass destruction and force it to pull out of "Palestine and occupied Arab land". Chief U.N. inspector Hans Blix told the U.N. Security Council on Friday Iraq's cooperation fell short of Council demands but applauded Baghdad's scrapping of al-Samoud missiles.

These yahoos are too much!


19 posted on 03/08/2003 5:48:21 AM PST by Aeronaut (This project is so important, we can't let things that are more important interfere with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut
Sorry folks, I screwed up the paragraph formatting.
20 posted on 03/08/2003 5:49:22 AM PST by Aeronaut (This project is so important, we can't let things that are more important interfere with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson