Posted on 03/07/2003 7:52:08 PM PST by RaceBannon
Edited on 03/07/2003 7:54:40 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
March 6 The expulsions of two Iraqi attachés came as FBI agents fanned out to interview thousands of Iraqis in the United States. Click "Play" to watch Lisa Myers' report for "NBC Nightly News."
By Lisa Myers NBC NEWS WASHINGTON, March 6 The FBI is conducting an intensive hunt for potential sleeper cells of Iraqi agents planted to strike in the event of war after two attachés at Iraqs U.N. mission in New York were caught filming bridges and tunnels, U.S. officials told NBC News. At least 70 Iraqi nationals are under active surveillance, law enforcement officials said, and agents have spread out to interview thousands of Iraqi men in an attempt to track down hundreds who came to the United States after the 1991 Gulf War and disappeared.
9/11 Mysteries In Plain Sight
By Jim Hoagland
Sunday, March 9, 2003; Page B07
Analysis and commentary are my bread and my butter. But detached perspective is in short supply when it comes to Khalid Sheik Mohammed. I hate this murdering terrorist chieftain even for being captured.
>>>snip<<<
He knows the answer to these two central questions: How did al Qaeda, within two or three years, go from obscurity to becoming super-terrorists capable of blowing up U.S. embassies, warships and skyscrapers with astonishing precision? And what are the links between 9/11 and the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993 by Ramzi Yousef, who authorities say is Mohammed's nephew?
>>>snip<<<
The U.S. media and government officials describe Mohammed and Yousef as "masters of disguise," and then assume they are who they say they are this time. There is scant reason to be so trusting. When Judge Kevin Thomas Duffy sentenced Yousef to life plus 240 years in 1998, he said: "We don't even know what your real name is."
>>>snip<<<
Mohammed migrated from the identity of small-time freelance terrorist to the top ranks of bin Laden's ultra-secretive band not long after the 1993 bombing resulted in the breakup of Yousef's U.S. network. Could al Qaeda have been the target of a takeover operation by an intelligence service with good legend-manufacturing skills and a great, burning desire for revenge on the United States?
________________________________________________________
I heard on the CBC this morning that Australia is also ousting an Iraqi diplomat.
Thanks for clearing that up. I thought that they were like guitar string wire, and wasn't being facetious at all. LOL!
How did al Qaeda, within two or three years, go from obscurity to becoming super-terrorists capable of blowing up U.S. embassies, warships and skyscrapers with astonishing precision?
A corollary: how did the same organization relapse into total incompetence the day after carrying out the most sophisticated terrorist attack in history?
The U.S. media and government officials describe Mohammed and Yousef as "masters of disguise," and then assume they are who they say they are this time. There is scant reason to be so trusting. When Judge Kevin Thomas Duffy sentenced Yousef to life plus 240 years in 1998, he said: "We don't even know what your real name is."
Why is the media not crawling over Chowan College and North Carolina A&T, interviewing Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's former associates? Why aren't we seeing that on TV every night? Is that not an incredible human interest story, at the very least? Why did we hardly hear about KSM or the connections between 9/11, Project Bojinka and the '93 WTC bombings for eighteen months after 9/11? The media blackout is reminiscent of the situation with the anthrax attack on American Media.
Why two men from the remote and ungoverned Pakistani province of Baluchistan who grew up in Kuwait would devote their lives to killing Americans is a mystery.
Indeed. Does anybody really believe that the individual below, Ramzi Yousef, mutated from a West Glamorgan-educated computer programmer working for the Kuwaiti government to a globe-hopping, skirt-chasing explosives expert, master of disguise and terrorist organizer in the space of three years? And if not, what happened to that Kuwaiti computer programmer, Abdul Basit, between the last official record of his former life -- a notation made in his passport at the Pakastani embassy in Kuwait two months before the Iraqi invasion -- and his re-emergence as a Philippines-based uber-terrorist?
Is this against the law? I wrote a piece that I posted within a couple weeks of 9/11. Here it is again. -----------
I'm sure I'll get flamed by the libertarians, but let's get real, instead of utopian! A free country can't judicially handle the kind of attacks we have witnessed and may soon witness. The conspiracy laws of our land are ill- prepared for what the terrorists are going to throw at us. Can we arrest a citizen for taking a movie of the Sears Tower or asking the building manager about the Achilles heal of the structure? Hardly? Here's a cut at the kind of laws that may help us survive the next few years.
1) Deportation of all science, engineering graduate students from terrorist sponsoring nations.
2) Deportation of all flight students and those that are learning how to operate heavy equipment from terrorist sponsoring nations.
3) Strict laws against possession (and or strictly license the acquisition process) of materials which can be used for bio and chemical weaponry.
4) Seizure of all incoming and outgoing funds to and from terrorist sponsoring nations.
5) Strict laws which make it illegal to communicate with terrorists.
6) Strict laws that make the combined acts of indirect contact (through third parties) with a terrorist and collecting information on infrastructure an act of terrorism or a conspiracy to commit terrorism offense.
7) Strict laws against anyone who has ever in the past had had direct contact with terrorists from being near reservoirs, power plants, food processing plants, or agricultural areas.
8) Strict hoax laws as there are for mentioning the word "bomb" at an airport or threatening the president's life.
This enemy is stealing the very freedoms we have fought so hard to obtain, so severe restrictions in our freedoms are unfortunately necessary to combat this kind of enemy. As it is, we can literally be bankrupted by any guy with a bag of flour and a box of envelopes.
The other answer is better, but less appetizing for the politically correct- absolute extermination of radical Islam and any and all pretenders to that cause.
As it is we're getting these guys on immigration violations. That's not enough! What about the ones who came here in the late 80s and are now citizens and who may in fact be working for our own government agencies? Face it folks, we're in deep dung unless we get a pretty fierce set of conspiracy laws on the books in very short order or are prepared to face the music on my other suggestion.
Would that be Al Canada. Geeze, I didn't know the Canadians had cells down here too!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.