Replies

As far as evidence linking Iraq with terrorist activity, somehow I doubt that you've got insider info from NSA, CIA or the Pentagon. What you know and don't know is irrelevant,

You do not have access to any "insider info" either.

Therefore:

I don't care that *you* don't see the differences in dealing with two different situations. You're just obtuse, the rest of us can see that.

You cannot see if there is or is not a difference between the two situations either.

You're just obtuse, the rest of us can see that.

And it is obvious to some that you're just displaying unjustified blind faith in the president.

Faith is a prerequisite for spirituality. It has no place in this situation.

Regards

J.R.

You cannot see if there is or is not a difference between the two situations either.
And it is obvious to some that you're just displaying unjustified blind faith in the president.

Faith is a prerequisite for spirituality. It has no place in this situation.

Y'know what? Just a while ago, I saw the President reflect on how he had sworn an oath to protect and defend the Constitution and by extension, America itself. Then, only a few minutes later, he rejected the notion that we would only act if the United Nations gave us the thumbs-up. You are entitled to your opinion, but in my estimation, the man has earned a measure of TRUST. Don't try to paint it as an element of spirituality, that is a specious argument.

As for the differences between the situations in Iraq and North Korea, my perception of the differences is based on what *has* been made public. Why some people insist on equating the two is frankly a mystery to me. Military force against North Korea might not be the right tool for the job - yet.