Replies

However, you must realize that by being anti-WOD you are anti-suppression of hard drugs in society. If your position were only to legalize pot, then that should be your position.

For all intents and purposes, that is my position. However, as I have mentioned before, I think the Federal War on Drugs is largely unconstitutional, and I believe each state should dictate their own policies. If this were the case, I would have no problem whatsoever with my state (NJ) banning cocaine, LSD, heroin, etc.

I am also pro-life, and oppose Roe v. Wade not only on a moral basis, but a constitutional basis as well. I think each state should decide whether or not to allow abortion, the same way it was before Roe v. Wade. It is another example of where the Federal government simply should not be involved.

If this were the case, I would have no problem whatsoever with my state (NJ) banning cocaine, LSD, heroin, etc.

Would you have a problem with your state legalizing cocaine, LSD, heroin, ecstasy, etc?

I think the Federal War on Drugs is largely unconstitutional, and I believe each state should dictate their own policies.

Thus you have no problem with pot dealers that are prosecuted under state laws?

I think each state should decide whether or not to allow abortion, the same way it was before Roe v. Wade.

Give that situation, you have no problem with the 14 year old that goes across the state line to get a legal abortion that would be banned in your state?