Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeTally
No, the argument in #47 is wrong. The punishment is not for stealing the golf clubs, the severe punishment is for the series of crimes that led to the final court appearance. It is the accumulative debt that the perpetrator owes to society. It is like a debtor who is given grace on his mortgage payment time and time again. Finally he misses a payment without asking for grace and the bank hits him with a repo notice.
54 posted on 03/05/2003 10:21:23 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Eva
Between 1984 and 1993, he was found guilty of four thefts and a battery. He should have been in jail for such crimes if he was such a threat to the community.

Put people in jail for violent crimes. Do not let them roam free, then make some crazy law that makes a non-violent offense the one that puts them away. Its stupid and shows no responsibility for the protection of the rights and lives of citizens. Three Strikes are two too many.

56 posted on 03/05/2003 10:33:34 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: Eva; ContentiousObjector
No, the argument in #47 is wrong. The punishment is not for stealing the golf clubs, the severe punishment is for the series of crimes that led to the final court appearance. It is the accumulative debt that the perpetrator owes to society. It is like a debtor who is given grace on his mortgage payment time and time again. Finally he misses a payment without asking for grace and the bank hits him with a repo notice.

I have no particular problem with this philosophy provided that all three offenses occur after the passage of the "three-strikes" statute. Since the function of the three-strikes statute is to add a temporarily-waived additional punishment to the earlier crimes, such a statute would constitute ex-post-facto legislation were it applied to crimes committed before its passage.

On a related note, I think that there should be some provision indicating that convicted felons who go crime-free for some period of time after completion of prison and probation terms should have all their rights restored, and have some degree of lenity on the three-strikes law (another felony could throw them in the slammer for a long time, but a misdemeanor probably shouldn't).

83 posted on 03/05/2003 3:30:47 PM PST by supercat (TAG--you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson