No, please stop. You are embarrassing yourself with your comments. You use no common sense, only repeat what the government has told you.
Again, was Iraq an eminent threat a year ago? If so, why didn't we bomb the country then? How about when there was evididence Iraq was involved in the OK City bombing? Why not then? I have to wonder what the real reason is when the President is saying "we got to do it, RIGHT NOW" when North Korea is essentially daring us to mess with them and threatening nuclear war.
And please, do not even try using "Clinton was in charge then" excuses.
Why would you assume poster Snowy does not form her own opinions when reviewing both sides? She just chose the other side of the coin you are on, which does not mean she should be in any way embarrassed by her comments.
Simply Put, Do we go mess with North Korea, and while doing so hope that Soddomy doesn't procure a Nuke? so we can fight the same battle twice?
You take out Saddam First, while Bombers stand poised to Strike North Korea if Kim Ibeillin Jong so much as twitches.
Plus, for fighters a Tune Up bout is always helpful.
Did it ever occur to you that our government knows more than we the public do about what Saddam has and what his ties are to other terrorists? Hmmm? Gee, you seem to have more time than you originally thought. The bottom line is I am not willing to risk the lives of my children on the 'feelings' of leftists whose only agenda is to undermine our president and government in order to gain control in the next election. Doing things peacefully got us 911.
This upcoming war should not be political, but it is because the democrats want to try to spin what they can to benefit them. We were attacked on our own soil for goodness sake. And, if no WMD ever existed in Iraq and no terrorists attacked on 911, wouldn't you believe that the HORRIBLE treatment of the Iraqi people would be enough to invade? That's where all of the 'no war' arguments fall through. They claim to care about human life but they fail to think about all of the Iraqi people who die by the hand of Saddam on a yearly basis. These people die while we sit on our hands and the lefties pass the bong at the peace rallies. It's almost as if the left thinks American lives are more important than those of the Iraqis. I thought the left cares about the oppressed, but I guess they don't.
Now, unlike you who claims not to have time to argue, I really don't have time for more discussion on this topic. You accuse me of getting my talking points from the government, which is false. I can think for myself, thank you. I will refrain from accusing you of getting your talking points from liberal websites, though I have seen them all listed there.