Replies

Great to hear that about the debate. More of us should take the intiative to do such things.

Both sides were lacking in alternatives to dealing with Iraq.

Yes, I too do not know the answer to the question as to what to do about Iraq if there is no war. Maybe those "for the war" and those "against the war" could sit around and throw out some ideas. Obviously, persons like the anti-American Saudi you spoke of will bring little legitimate discourse to the debate. I think as long as "both sides" can agree that Iraq is a definite problem, then a solution other than war may be worked out. Then again, maybe such a solution couldn't be found.

My group got started 4 years ago and we meet monthly to discuss Constitutional issues and other relevent current events. It's hard work, but fun and rewarding too.

Identifying a problem is always a lot easier than finding the right solution, but I believe that the anti-America left will do anything to derail this country and GWB because they truly hate this country. If truth be told, short of war to remove Saddam, I don't know of any other thing that could work. Sanctions didn't. UN resolutions didn't. Talking sure didn't. Either we ignore him (at all of our peril) or we take the risk and burden of removing a dangerous despot because we are the only ones that can.

I am only a recent convert to this action myself. I wasn't opposed to war, I just was sure that I was for it. But when I see all the leftist, hate America, Bush bashing (and I've done my share of that myself) scumbag socialists and communists oppose the war, I just *had* to be for it.