Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaiHuy
Your logic is really faulty. If dog attacks are a result of human mishandling then all large breeds should attack in the same ratio. Labradors are waaaay more numerous in the US than pit bulls or Rotweillers. Yet studies show that almost all serious dog attacks in the US are by pit bulls and rotweillers (german sheppards are #3). Are you suggesting that somehow Lab or St. Bernard owners are better people than pit bull or rotweiller owners? Kinda sounds like your limp racism analogy in your original post. Pit bulls should be exterminated...I know people that have them and it's a constant struggle to keep them under control. They've been banned in England.
132 posted on 03/07/2003 3:55:27 PM PST by Deb8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: Deb8
Deb: Please read this carefully, you obviously missed some things when you read your statistical evidence. The following was taken from www.dogbitelaw.com.

The dogs most likely to bite The Centers for Disease Control study dog bite incidents, including the types of dogs most likely to bite. The breeds that the CDC considers highest risk are pit bulls, Rottweilers, German shepherds, huskies, Alaskan malamutes, Doberman pinschers, chows, Great Danes, St. Bernards and Akitas.

Owners of such dogs should be aware that if their dogs attack a person, the attacks may be scrutinized by law enforcement. The reason is that irresponsible behavior with or toward a dog whose breed is known to bite has caused a rising and unacceptable injury and death toll, which authorities are determined to stem.

"Irresponsible behavior" is defined differently from place to place. In California, for example, it can be a felony for a person to possess a dog trained to fight, attack or kill that, because of the owner's lack of ordinary care, bites two people or seriously injures one person. (See Felony prosecution of attack dog owners.)

In different parts of the United States at the current time, there are a number of parents who are on trial for manslaughter because their dogs have killed their children. In these cases, the prosecutors have taken the position that the parents behaved irresponsibly because they left their children in the company of dogs most likely to bite.

There is an 8 out of 10 chance that a biting dog is male. (Humane Society of the United States.)

Although pit bull mixes and Rottweillers are most likely to kill and seriously maim, fatal attacks since 1975 have been attributed to dogs from at least 30 breeds.

The most horrifying example of the lack of breed predictibility is theOctober 2000 death of a 6-week-old baby, which was killed by her family's Pomeranian dog. The average weight of a Pomeranian is about 4 pounds, and they are not thought of as a dangerous breed. Note, however, that they were bred to be watchdogs! The baby's uncle left the infant and the dog on a bed while the uncle prepared her bottle in the kitchen. Upon his return, the dog was mauling the baby, who died shortly afterwards. ("Baby Girl Killed by Family Dog," Los Angeles Times, Monday, October 9, 2000, Home Edition, Metro Section, Page B-5.)

In all fairness, therefore, it must be noted that: Any dog, treated harshly or trained to attack, may bite a person. Any dog can be turned into a dangerous dog. The owner most often is responsible -- not the breed, and not the dog.

An irresponsible owner or dog handler might create a situation that places another person in danger by a dog, without the dog itself being dangerous, as in the case of the Pomeranian that killed the infant (see above).

Any individual dog may be a good, loving pet, even though its breed is considered to be likely to bite. A responsible owner can win the love and respect of a dog, no matter its breed. One cannot look at an individual dog, recognize its breed, and then state whether or not it is going to attack.

Enough said.

146 posted on 03/12/2003 12:06:28 PM PST by DaiHuy (MUST HAVE JUST BEEN BORN THAT WAY...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: Deb8
One factor to consider is that no one is breeding Labradors for aggressiveness. Many irresponsible pit bull breeders are. Also, that "limp racism" (which in my opinion has nothing to do with race) is a fact: many people in bad neighborhoods actually foster aggressiveness in an already-aggressive breed.

Add in the dog fighters, and you have a situation which is a bit more complex, in my opinon, than you make it out to be.

150 posted on 03/26/2003 5:57:32 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson