I'm not that far behind you- I was in college in '71. Older is better - except when you're dating the earth.
How do you guys account for the slow downhill slide of the human over 30? The younger we are, the greater our immunity and strength. The body is self-reparing and actually improves itself till about age 19. Why does it stop improving at all? If we continue to exercise and provide an adequate diet, why do we deteriorate?
It would seem that the ever-present urge to live would have had enough time to hammer out a longer lifespan and that decline should start at maybe age 55 instead of 19. There just doesn't seem to be a good reason that we should die of old age.
Another aging problem is that organs and systems tend to wear out at the same time. IOW, if your spleen is failing and you haul it to the hospital for repair, it won't be long until your liver fails or your heart or your brain. Even your bones, muscles and blood vessels fail at about the same time. The body seems to have a universal self-destruct code built in to it.
Even more perplexing to evolutionists should be why dogs only get to live about 10 years and humans get about 75. Dogs have been evolving longer and have 7 times more generations (and even more offspring) than man, theoretically giving the dog the evolutionary edge.