Skip to comments.
Michael Jackson Put 'Curse' on Spielberg-Magazine
Reuters ^
Posted on 03/03/2003 9:54:03 PM PST by per loin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201 next last
To: nmh
I want my Mommy
61
posted on
03/03/2003 11:52:03 PM PST
by
Queen Jadis
(SP Bumper sitcker "Trade Corp, ask me about my line of S--- I've been delivering")
To: PatriotGames
Haba Haba! Wabe caballed abit "Ab Talk" aband maby mabothaber tabaught abus! ;-D
62
posted on
03/04/2003 12:02:31 AM PST
by
Judith Anne
(The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.)
To: lonewacko_dot_com; ArcLight
The general rule seems to be that factual imossibility is not a valid defense. In particular it is not a valid defense in crimes of attempt. Still hoping a lawyer will enter, stage right.
63
posted on
03/04/2003 12:05:50 AM PST
by
per loin
To: nopardons
I've known this as Ab Talk since I was a little kid. Our mother taught us, and it's funny sounding and almost impossible to decipher if you aren't used to it...
You = Yabou. Me = Mabe. Him = Habim. Song = sabong.
Psychology = Psabychabolabolgaby.
;-D
64
posted on
03/04/2003 12:06:12 AM PST
by
Judith Anne
(The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.)
To: nopardons
You add the syllable "ab" to every syllable, behind the beginning consonant. If there is no beginning consonant, then at the beginning of the syllable.
Is - abis
no - nabo
Consonant = Cabon sabon abant
65
posted on
03/04/2003 12:12:46 AM PST
by
Judith Anne
(The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.)
To: Judith Anne
Thanks for the explination.
The Three Stooges had a routine, in one of their films, with a made-up language too. I think that it must have been a craze, in the 1930's , which only caught on and remained, in a few places. :-)
To: nopardons
If there is a double consonant at the beginning of the syllable, such as in "spook" then use both, i.e. "spabook."
trash = trabash.
there = thabere
syllable = sabyllababable (there are exceptions to every rule)
exceptions =
abexcabeptiabons.
67
posted on
03/04/2003 12:16:38 AM PST
by
Judith Anne
(The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.)
To: nopardons
Your welcome. It's a little more sophisticated than pig latin...but not much. I taught my grandchildren...they think it's hilarious!
Mom used to have an alphabet, too, that we'd spell words out with...it was even MORE complicated...she said this goofy stuff helped keep us out of trouble. It might actually be true...;-D
68
posted on
03/04/2003 12:20:01 AM PST
by
Judith Anne
(The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.)
To: Judith Anne
Again, many thanks for an even fuller explination. :-)
Your mother was right. Kids used to get caught up in this sort of thing, play games,use their imaginations and that made a great deal of difference !
It's fantastic, that you taught this to your grandchildren. It's like brain teasers and, believe it or not, things like this and music, make the brain grow. :-)
To: nopardons
Erk! Make that "You're welcome." (I'm guilty of one of my own pet peeves. I hate when that happens!)
A good brain, such as Michael Jackson may have had, can choose between sick and healthy thoughts, between good and bad behavior, between wise and foolish decisions, between decent and indecent actions, between truth and falsehood...I think he may have destroyed himself by his choices.
70
posted on
03/04/2003 12:48:55 AM PST
by
Judith Anne
(The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.)
To: per loin
The only good news in this sorry story is that Jackson may have to sell his most valuable asset, The Beatles catalog.
Paul McCartney, call your office.
71
posted on
03/04/2003 12:55:52 AM PST
by
JoeA
To: Judith Anne
I don't think that Michael Jackson ever had a " good " brain ; AB language skills or not. I think that he had emotional and mental problems from day one. The more sucessful he became, the worse he got. Part of that may ( or may NOT ) be because of his parents.
There's no doubt, whatsoever, that he has destroyed himself.
Yes, the contraction mess, which so many are afflicted with here, bothers me too. I knew that your's was a typo...after having read so many of your previous posts. :-)
To: per loin; ArcLight; lonewacko_dot_com
Very interesting. Forget the actual feeding of Magic Fairy Pixel Dust (since as stated, it doesn't exist). The question is simplified, by keeping it narrow. Is the act of hiring (or conspiring with) another person to commit an act of murder, by using a non-existant dust, a magical hex, or some voodoo practice a crime?
I believe it is. Jackson should be charged with either attempted murder or conspiracy to commit murder. Obviously, his sanity can be made a defense issue once he has been charged. But it would be very wrong to disregard this because one likes his music, is attracted to his unusual behavior and looks, or because he is just an eccentric rich person.
A crime is a crime, regardless of who commits it.
73
posted on
03/04/2003 1:19:06 AM PST
by
jackbob
To: general_re; way-right-of-center; dighton; aculeus; Poohbah; BlueLancer; Thinkin' Gal
This leads me to admit to a long-term relationship with Vanity Fair.
It's not got a conservative slant but lots of juicy articles like this, regular columns by Christopher Hitchens and Dominick Dunne ... and the sexiest fashion ads in existence.
Incidental intelligence: Maureen Orth is the wife of Tim Russert.
74
posted on
03/04/2003 1:24:13 AM PST
by
aculeus
(They also serve who ping and bump.)
To: jackbob
But it would be very wrong to disregard this because one likes his music, is attracted to his unusual behavior and looks, or because he is just an eccentric rich person. A crime is a crime, regardless of who commits it.
Yes. But judging by what I've seen on this thread, Americans are so rapt in awe by Jackson, that they will condone his conspiracy to commit mass murder.
75
posted on
03/04/2003 1:27:46 AM PST
by
per loin
To: per loin
I hesitate to criticize the Vanity Fair piece. To the contrary of what one may think, Vanity Fair has published some excellent articles including an expose on how Clinton failed to accept Osama Bin Laden's extradition despite being offered it on three separate occasions. However, this article's claims appear unsubstantiated. This kind of poorly researched journalism, which I assume was sponsored by Jackson's enemies in the Martin Bashir camp (the two have been feuding ever since Jackson's documentary aired recently; Jackson countered with his own documentary of Bashir's dishonesty on nationwide tv), will unfortunately reduce Vanity Fair's journalistic credibility.
To: per loin
I don't think they are so much "condoning" this action as much as laughing it off as another of Michael's kooky ways. They don't stop to consider that the witch doctor could arrange hits to "prove" the effectiveness of his spells. With a high-profile customer recommendation, like would have come from MJ, the sky would have been the limit for suckering in others.
77
posted on
03/04/2003 2:46:47 AM PST
by
JudyB1938
(It's a wild world. There's a lot of bad and beware.)
To: jagrmeister
However, this article's claims appear unsubstantiated. This kind of poorly researched journalism...Is the issue with the article already available?
78
posted on
03/04/2003 3:11:49 AM PST
by
per loin
To: JudyB1938
I don't think they are so much "condoning" this action as much as laughing it off as another of Michael's kooky waysI think that the two are, in effect, the same.
79
posted on
03/04/2003 3:13:21 AM PST
by
per loin
To: per loin
What cheap shots. "Jackson bleaches his skin white because he does not like being black." They did not get this from Jackson so Reuters does not know. And would they say the same about any other star that has changed their appearance? Not likely.
Reuters is pure drivel. They like printing gossip becuase they don't like being journalists.
80
posted on
03/04/2003 3:25:42 AM PST
by
MissBaby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson