Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eddie willers
"Next they will discover that these slaves were sold "Down the River" to the South and after they had "divested" (unloaded) their inventory, they then abolished the practice. (And congratulated themselves about how "compassionate" they were)"
Right on the money - the North didn't need African slaves any more because of the glut of Irish (economic slaves)that they considered more intelligent and productive and easier to control. They had no compassion for blacks - they wanted them all sent back to Africa to fend for themselves.
15 posted on 03/02/2003 4:38:23 PM PST by afz400
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: afz400
Right on the money - the North didn't need African slaves any more because of the glut of Irish (economic slaves)that they considered more intelligent and productive and easier to control.

Your chronology is out of whack. Most Northern states had abolished slavery quite some time before massive Irish immigration. Prior to the 1820s, most Irish immigrants were Scots-Irish Protestants, and nobody ever claimed they were easy to control!

17 posted on 03/02/2003 4:47:27 PM PST by Restorer (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: afz400
...to fend for themselves.

A fair definition of freedom, that. It's all I want, if the government would only let me.

32 posted on 03/02/2003 6:38:22 PM PST by Oberon (I wish T. Jefferson were here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson