To: Indy Pendance
Let's see, you have 2 nukes. We have over 2,000. If we fire oh, say, 30, that should more than answer your two and eliminate the North Korean problem once and for all.
8 posted on
03/02/2003 6:39:47 AM PST by
Beck_isright
(going to war without the French is like duck hunting without an accordian)
To: Beck_isright
I think it'd be wise to restrain our nukes, just so we can limit the radioactive fallout over Japan - still a reliable ally. I think if it comes down to that, 4 or 5 thermonuclear devices (versus NKs puny atomic bombs) should do the trick nicely enough.... ;)
10 posted on
03/02/2003 6:44:44 AM PST by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: Beck_isright
Then S Korea can use it as a parking lot.
To: Beck_isright
Let's see, you have 2 nukes. We have over 2,000. If we fire oh, say, 30, that should more than answer your two and eliminate the North Korean problem once and for all.
Not only that, he's might have a couple of crude fission devices. We have hydrogen warhead city killers that have been refined and improved for half a century. If Kim Jong Il wants to take a knife to a gunfight, that's fine with me.
13 posted on
03/02/2003 6:49:32 AM PST by
SpaceBar
To: Beck_isright
If we fire oh, say, 30For that country any after 4 would just be re-arranging the rubble.
To: Beck_isright
We have over 2,000.
Over 10,000.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson