Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Turkish Parliament Rejects U.S. Plan to Send 62,000 Combat Troops to Turkey for Iraq War
AP ^

Posted on 03/01/2003 6:06:48 PM PST by TheOtherOne

Turkish Parliament Rejects U.S. Plan to Send 62,000 Combat Troops to Turkey for Iraq War

Published: Mar 1, 2003

advertisement

ANKARA, Turkey (AP) - Turkey's parliament dealt a stunning blow to U.S. war planning Saturday by failing to approve a bill allowing in American combat troops to open a northern front against Iraq.

The decision, which likely will strain ties with Washington, marked a setback to U.S. efforts to show Saddam Hussein that he is surrounded and his neighbors support a U.S.-led coalition.

The parliament vote was 264-250 in favor, with 19 abstentions. But speaker Bulent Arinc said the outcome fell three votes short of the simple majority required by the constitution. He then closed parliament until Tuesday.

Prime Minister Abdullah Gul hastily met with top ministers and party leaders after the vote. Before going in, a visibly shaken and angry Gul said, "We will assess all this."

Gul did not speak after that meeting. Private NTV and CNN-Turk television stations quoted unnamed officials as saying the government was not planning to resubmit the motion to parliament.

Officials were not immediately available for comment. The leaders of Gul's Justice and Development Party are expected to meet Sunday to discuss what action to take.

U.S. Ambassador Robert Pearson rushed to the Foreign Ministry after the vote.

"We had certainly hoped for a favorable decision," he said. "We will wait for further information and advice from the government of Turkey about how we should proceed."

Turkish lawmakers had faced overwhelming public opposition to basing U.S. troops on Turkish soil. Yet Washington had been so sure of winning approval from close ally and NATO member Turkey, that ships carrying U.S. tanks are waiting off Turkey's coast for deployment and the U.S. military has thousands of tons of military equipment ready to unload at the southern Turkish port of Iskenderun.

For weeks, the Bush administration had been pressing Turkey to agree to a possible northern front, which would split Saddam Hussein's army between the north and the south, likely making a war shorter and less bloody.

The motion would have empowered Turkey's government to authorize the basing of up to 62,000 troops, 255 warplanes and 65 helicopters. In exchange, Washington promised $15 billion in loans and grants to cushion the Turkish economy from the impact of war.

Besides that funding, Turkey also risks losing Washington's support which was crucial in securing billions in loans that rescued the country during an economic crisis in 2001.

The United States has also pushed Turkey's eagerly sought candidacy in the European Union. And if Turkey does not agree to host U.S. forces, it loses a say in the future of neighboring Iraq if there is a war.

That is a critical issue for Turkey, which fears that a war could lead Kurds in northern Iraq to declare an independent state and in turn inspire Turkey's own Kurdish minority.

Nonetheless, Turkey's governing party had difficulty selling the unpopular measure to the Turkish people and could not push through the motion despite its overwhelming majority in parliament.

Polls show as much as 94 percent of the Muslim-dominated Turkish public opposes a war with Iraq. Before the vote, 50,000 Turks staged an anti-war rally near parliament as 4,000 police stood guard. They chanted "No to War" and "We don't want to be America's soldiers." Some carried banners that read: "The people will stop this war."

After the speaker nullified the vote, hundreds of Turks celebrated in the streets of central Ankara, shouting anti-U.S. slogans.

"We are all Iraqis ... We will not kill, we will not die," they chanted. They also accused the Islamic-rooted Justice party of "collaborating" with Washington.

The Justice party was planning to meet Sunday, said Reha Denemec, the party's deputy chairman. "We did not expect these results, but this is a democracy," he said.

AP-ES-03-01-03 2023EST



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allyturkey; iraq; turkey; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-179 next last
To: Torie
Actually we do need them because there are no other allies that can contribute 50,000 plus troops to patrol the Iranian and Syrian border regions, unless we want to keep 200,000 plus of our own boys there for a long, lont time. Something doesn't add up with this and I'm beginning to think there are some serious deceptions for the benefit of Iraq's leadership and public consumption. That's too much money for Turkey to leave on the table and too much influence in the Middle East to surrender.
101 posted on 03/01/2003 9:47:09 PM PST by Beck_isright (going to war without the French is like duck hunting without an accordian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: eeriegeno
Powel and the rest of the peacenick State Department types..."Peace in our times?"
102 posted on 03/01/2003 9:49:37 PM PST by dinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
If we beleive A_Turk, what Turkey is more interested in patrolling is not borders, but the Kurd area of Iraq, which is fraught with incendiary issues post Saddam.
103 posted on 03/01/2003 9:50:44 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: mykdsmom
I felt they were blackmailing us anyway.

They were, are, and will continue to squeeze and blackmail us. Hey, about using those $15 billion we will be sending to Africa to fight the pseudo AIDS epidemic to pay off the Turkish?

104 posted on 03/01/2003 9:52:01 PM PST by RecentConvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
cut the Turks out now! lets guarentee an autonomise kurdish state! (SRY 4 spelling)
105 posted on 03/01/2003 9:52:27 PM PST by KingNo155
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
The fewer alliances we form with scumbag islamic governments, the better off we are.

You nailed it.

106 posted on 03/01/2003 9:54:24 PM PST by RecentConvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Procyon
Interesting idea! Looks like the transit time would be quicker and less mountainous too.
107 posted on 03/01/2003 9:56:02 PM PST by mikenola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Actually, from my conversations with a_Turk, the desire is to have a unified Iraq state under a strong democratically elected government with one military and no factional armed militias. The problem is that we, the Turks, Iraqis, Syrians, Iranians, etc. have armed all aspects of the various ethnic groups in Iraq and disarming them will require a lot of manpower and a strong central government open to all. I think that if this is not a deception and the Turks do not allow us to use their bases in reality, then I think it will be the end of NATO. And that is not a bad thing IMHO.
108 posted on 03/01/2003 9:56:22 PM PST by Beck_isright (going to war without the French is like duck hunting without an accordian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
MEMO TO UN, France, Germany, Russia, China, Turkey, and especially you idiotic 'Human Shields':

EVERYBODY GET THE H*LL OUT OF THE KITCHEN IMMEDIATELY! Dinner is about to be served. ALL BS negotiations, deals, and arrangements are now null, void, AND irrelevant...

BTW, the massive round-the-clock bombing begins in five minutes.

109 posted on 03/01/2003 9:57:35 PM PST by F16Fighter (Democrats: 'Hating and betraying America's heritage is our "right."')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
My concern is we have a huge amount of personel and equipment hanging out like sitting ducks.
110 posted on 03/01/2003 9:57:54 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather
Not really. We can cross it back into Greece and Bulgaria in short order. Also we need to be in that region anyways to move into the Central Asian Republics to surround Iran anyways. The most important thing we must do, regardless of this outcome with Turkey and NATO, is to create a buffer between Iran and Russia. Neither are to be trusted.
111 posted on 03/01/2003 10:00:00 PM PST by Beck_isright (going to war without the French is like duck hunting without an accordian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

Okay, here's the deal....

...We don't need Turkey. All we have to do is move the forces into Northern Iraq and set up there. It's a logistical undertaking, but I think it could be worked out.


112 posted on 03/01/2003 10:08:22 PM PST by CurlyBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
Hmmm logistics logistics.... what happens if Turkey gets wacked with a Bio weapon..? Don't you think they are looking a bit vulnerable right now?
113 posted on 03/01/2003 10:12:32 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather
Not really. We're a pretty good distance from Iraq and it would take a seriously lucky shot to hit those guys on the ground. I'm more worried about our shores and the Kuwait bases than the Northern front. I'm more concerned about 10 or 20 122mm shells with VX being dropped in our assembly areas inside Kuwait than anything in Turkey.
114 posted on 03/01/2003 10:17:46 PM PST by Beck_isright (going to war without the French is like duck hunting without an accordian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
great now that will make me sleep better. Thanks for your info. Goodnight.
115 posted on 03/01/2003 10:19:09 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

Turkey is not the fiscal cripple like they play at.
European banking has been in Turkey a long time...even with Turkeys historic political re-alignments..the Euro Banking continued.
This is multi layered banking..aka shipping Insurance and Re-Insurance..some of the Biggy Euro Insurance firms playing here..and why U.N. Sanctions guranteed iraqi oil flowing....with the Euro stamp on it.
Clinton had some trouble with the Turks,who had found a new friend in Russia,both of them swimming in Caspian oil.
BP oil didn't mind..neither the French..or the Euro's.
Russia was helped along fiscally,encouraged to move away from arms/weapons sales to broker oil/gas and supplier too.
Russia was elevated by the U.S. oil technical experts...Russia was steered into the oil/gas market in Europe as a reward for co-oping with the U.S. in world stratagem.
The Caspian:

Lots of players here..Russia prime..Turkey too..in that the Turks have a big slice in oil/gas pipelines ,terminals,and the Euro Insurance thingy.
Caspian oil/gas is not good quality..it requires cleaning..and is costly.
U.S. oil firms want the low sulphur oil of Iraq and the Persian gulf..content to build pipelines via consortium with the new Stans...with a view of providing the Orient for its new thirst.

Turkey:

Clearly they are not waffling like they have some internal thing to work out..bluntly...Europe and Russia are diverting Turkeys attention.
Europe is chaffing at the words of the U.S of recent...they are getting even by stroking the Turks...who are throwing a wrench in things.
Turkey is in a vulnerable spot however...Russia is by no means able to foot the money needed to keep Caspian chugging along...Russia does the dance still of buying U.S. Dollars and buying into the Euro.

Turkey may be intoxicated with its new power and friends,...she should also consider her fate..which could easily become a Jobe Ash heap like Iran..who paid big time for screwing up the oil/military contracts of the past....
Iran......still staggering in third world oblivion.

****************************
Project to build gas pipeline from the Caspian Sea to Turkey is launched February 28, 2003 Baku, February 28, 2003. (CNA). The international partners working to build a natural gas pipeline from the Caspian Sea to Turkey gave the US$3.2 billion project the go-ahead on Thursday. When complete, the project will pump an estimated 8.4 billion cubic meters (296.61 billion cubic feet) of gas annually from the Shah Deniz field through Baku and the Georgian capital Tbilisi to Erzurum in Turkey. Construction gets underway next year, and the first gas deliveries are expected in 2006. "Another milestone has been achieved," Medjid Kerimov, Azerbaijan's minister of fuel and energy, said at the official ceremony in Baku, according to a press statement. "The scale of the project means that Azerbaijan is now firmly positioned to become a major gas exporter." Natig Aliev, president of Azerbaijan's state-owned oil company, said the project will help bring this impoverished region "economic prosperity and stability." BP PLC will operate the pipeline. Other participants are Norway's Statoil, Azerbaijan's state oil company and France's TotalFinaElf. The project calls for a drilling platform, five underwater wells, two underwater pipelines, aboveground pipelines, and an onshore processing terminal. A Russian diplomat this week expressed concern about the environmental impact of pipelines along the bottom of the Caspian, but there was no indication that Russian complaints would have any direct effect on the project.

Fears mar launch of BP-Statoil energy project February 28, 2003 AN ENERGY project linking gasfields in the Caspian Sea with Europe was launched yesterday by BP and Statoil, of Norway. But the $3.2 billion (£2 billion) investment is dogged by concerns that Turkey, the main buyer for the fuel, will not need the gas when it comes on stream in 2006. Statoil, which has taken on the role of commercial operator for the Shah Deniz gas project, said that contracts for gas sales had been signed with Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey. A pipeline will stretch 690km from the Shah Deniz gasfield offshore from Baku to Erzurum in eastern Turkey where it will join the gas grid operated by Botas, Turkey’s state gas company. Deliveries of gas are expected from early 2006 but analysts doubt that there is a market for the fuel because the economy is stagnating and Turkey has bought too much gas. A spokesman for Statoil agreed that demand was an issue. “At the end of the day it looks like there will be a gas surplus but we don’t think we will have a problem because our gas is priced very competitively.” Turkey recently renegotiated a contract to buy gas from Russia, securing a 9 per cent price reduction for the fuel, which reaches Turkey through the recently completed Blue Stream pipeline under the Black Sea. Turkey has also agreed to buy gas from Iran and liquefied gas from Nigeria but the Government has twice lowered its forecasts of an increase in demand for the fuel. Botas has plans to re-export gas through a planned pipeline to Greece and another line running north to Austria but these projects are at very early stages of planning. BP and Statoil each have a quarter share in the gasfield and the South Caucasus pipeline, which will follow the route of the controversial Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline.

116 posted on 03/01/2003 10:32:02 PM PST by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
Tsk, tsk... I would certainly hate to see things now unfold in such a way that a Kurdish state were to be established on Turkey's border. That would, no doubt, be a cause for concern in Ankara. In fact, I'm fairly certain that they'd go so far as to ask the US to intervene in such a scenario and prevent a Kurdish state from being founded. Of course, there's nothing in America's interests that demands a Kurdish state, but one still wonders why we would intervene. Isn't that the sort of thing one friend would do for another? It's the "friend" part that's looking... What's the word? ...murky. Perhaps if the Turks were our friends; but alas, Parliament doesn't seem to think that the term applies here.
117 posted on 03/01/2003 10:40:07 PM PST by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
I assume that a one-front war would require a much longer period of bombardment from the air as in 1991. This to eliminate any enemy bombardment. Plus the word must get out that any use of Cemical and biological weapons on their part, especially if they threatened US forces and caused signnificant casulaties, would mean we would take all appropriate measures in response.

Of course, a more limited offensive from the north is possible and that we would make full use of existing opposition forces without the distraction of Turk-Kurd animosities. If Turkey stays out, a Kurdish republic seem inevitable.

I gather that this will sink in pretty soon. Will the Army allow the Islamists to make the Kurdish problem more difficult?

The "game" becomes ever more interesting.
118 posted on 03/01/2003 10:45:00 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: eeriegeno
Powell should resign,but Bush should have known better and listened to two far more important indivduals Cheney and Rumsfeld.This UN mess is going to cost him the election in 2004,thanks to the all perfect Powell.
119 posted on 03/01/2003 10:53:52 PM PST by deedgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
"Plus the word must get out that any use of Cemical and biological weapons on their part, especially if they threatened US forces and caused signnificant casulaties, would mean we would take all appropriate measures in response."

My concern is that the rules are different this time. Sadamn knows if we detonate a nuke, we become the parriahs of the civilized world, the only nation to do this twice in history. Plus what does he care, he'll be hiding out in another nation the moment the bombs drop.

"If Turkey stays out, a Kurdish republic seem inevitable."

Not a prayer in hell. If we allow a Kurdish republic to form, it will destabalize the region for the next 200 years. And Turkey will never allow it. The minute we withdrew our forces, they would squash it. Not to mention do you really want the Kurds as an ally? They are less trustworthy than the french.

"Will the Army allow the Islamists to make the Kurdish problem more difficult? "

More like will the Army allow the IRANIANS to make the Kurdish problem more difficult???

Life will not be boring for the next 2 months that's for sure....
120 posted on 03/01/2003 11:04:00 PM PST by Beck_isright (going to war without the French is like duck hunting without an accordian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson