To: kattracks
Since I'm not privy to all the information that President Bush has, I will presume that there are very good reason for the wait. I would prefer that all things are in place for the utmost safety of our troops, rather than see a premature attack. I hope you're right. I'd hate to see this whole mess come back to haunt President Bush. The leftist press whittles away at the Presidents popularity rating with every passing day. As you say, we don't have ALL the facts but I hope we aren't waiting in vain.
9 posted on
03/01/2003 2:01:48 PM PST by
teletech
(Its time to bomb Saddam)
To: teletech
I don't know if I agree that waiting is good... here is my rant:
it seems the longer Bush waits, the more public opinion damages his position. The more angry his opposition becomes, the less support he will have despite success in Iraq. The opposition is so upset that they will deny anything positive came out of it... if US troops found nuclear weapons in Iraq, many will deny it for the sake of their egos.
If they claim he's lying now, what makes you think they won't claim he's lying about a success in Iraq? Undeniable proof means nothing to idealogues. I believe the phrase "history is what we agree upon" applies to this. The idealogues will rewrite history to fit their view, they don't care. This is why conservatives need to avoid the public opinion spin trap! it is pointless, the key to accomplishing nothing, but letting a lot of people feel good, blah.
Bush needs to act, the longer you let these people whine, the more rooted they become in their irrationality. I think this has permanently damaged Bush, it is scary. If we have another democrat in office I will be bummed.
Go Bush Go!
16 posted on
03/01/2003 3:09:40 PM PST by
lizm_77
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson