[RonF]

So why don't they define it?

Good question. I don't know. Ask them.

[Stone Mountain]

So why don't they define it? Good question. I don't know. Ask them.

I think we both know. Creating objective criterion for being an "avowed" homosexual would mean that they would have to live by those criterion. The BSA is clearly not ready or capable of doing such a thing. For that matter, is there any kind of consensus out there as to what an "avowed" homosexual is? As it is, the BSA can interpret to mean whatever they want it to mean. Giving an interview to a paper, attending a parade, whatever - much more flexible that way.